ContinueWe use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website; if you continue without changing your settings - or dismiss this message - we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on Forums.Football Web


Return to front page

Newest article: Re: Portsmouth by SevToday 13:21Today at 13:21:54view thread

Oldest article: Announcement Possible - SG1 Radio by Ratman4628/3 12:41Thu Mar 28 12:41:58 2019view thread


Next thread: Turnstiles by Sev28/5 13:11Tue May 28 13:11:37 2019view thread

Re: This Bury thing

By Bladders (BALDOCKBORO)22/5 21:50Wed May 22 21:50:38 2019In response to This Bury thing

Views: 948

I was in 100% agreement with you until 'Let Mansfield go up.....'

As for the players contract, I guess it depends on the terms and conditions but most contracts have a clause that cancels it if one side doesn't or can't fulfil their obligations.

Financial Fair Play, like the 'fit and proper' criteria isn't worth the paper Shaun Harevy had it printed onto, clubs routinely bend and break the rules, largely with impunity, chucking extra money in through inflated sponsorship and the like, things have to really go to ratshit before points get docked or transfer bans are imposed.

As it stands Wallace could lease a meeting room at the stadium for his food group for £1m an hour, or rent advertising hoardings at way above market rate and it would probably get waived through as legitimate income which could then be used for players.

That's how Man City do it, allegedly.

reply to this article | return to the front page

3 people like this 3 people   

Next article in this thread: Re: This Bury thing by Paulio22/5 22:06Wed May 22 22:06:11 2019

Previous thread: A Massive thank you by Bankerbob26/5 15:24Sun May 26 15:24:25 2019view thread