ContinueWe use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website; if you continue without changing your settings - or dismiss this message - we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on Forums.Football Web


Return to front page

Newest article: Re: Wallace by AgentEvesToday 00:31Today at 00:31:57view thread

Oldest article: Dino's Now on Twitter by Ratman4627/6 09:15Thu Jun 27 09:15:09 2019view thread


Next thread: Southend at home tomorrow (cup) by SBFC4LIFE12/8 13:57Mon Aug 12 13:57:52 2019view thread

Re: Tom Parkes

By Puds (Chuds)13/8 17:11Tue Aug 13 17:11:29 2019In response to Re: Tom Parkes

Views: 376

How can you say they probably wouldn't have scored? Absolutely no way of knowing that. Plenty of sides with ten men score, and the guy involved was not involved in the goal so no direct causal effect of him still being on and the goal going in.

You simply cannot categorically say the decision to not send him off cost us a point. Had he awarded them an incorrect penalty from which they scored, I could get on board with the accusation a bit more, but not here.

Edited by Chuds at 17:12:24 on 13th August 2019

reply to this article | return to the front page


Next article in this thread: Re: Tom Parkes by Puds13/8 13:29Tue Aug 13 13:29:37 2019

Previous thread: Not much chatter about tonight by Puds13/8 19:19Tue Aug 13 19:19:11 2019view thread