ContinueWe use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website; if you continue without changing your settings - or dismiss this message - we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on Forums.Football Web


Super proud sponsors of Alex Revell IDST

Return to front page

Newest article: Re: Match Thread - Newport (a) by WASPToday 09:29Today at 09:29:47view thread

Oldest article: Buying a ticket (ST holder) by Eazy29/11/2020 13:29Sun Nov 29 13:29:16 2020view thread


Next thread: University Questionnaires for Stevenage FC fans by Ed House16/2 12:44Tue Feb 16 12:44:22 2021view thread


By Freemo22/2 20:14Mon Feb 22 20:14:05 2021In response to Re: Walsall match thread

Views: 244

To reiterate, you said Prosser had a poor game, Number Ninja asserted that he was brought off to bring on Martin as an 'attacking defender'.

You object to this term and cited it as making no sense and 'devoid of all understanding of football'. By your own admission, you and Number Ninja were describing the same flaw in Prosser's abilities. You are denying that the term should be used for a centre back. Martin spent more time passing forwards than he did defending, but because he was stood behind the other outfield players, you refuse to accept that he was in any sense a defender doing any attacking.

When I pointed out this is pedantic, since you are not in charge of the English language and the point being made was perfectly bloody obvious and one that you agreed with in the first place, you have imagined an argument we were engaged in to then claim the goalposts were moved in it.

You are shooting walls of text at your own reflection in a hall of mirrors and it looks weird.

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Next article in this thread: Re: WARNING: DO NOT READ IF NOT AGENTEVES by AgentEves22/2 21:01Mon Feb 22 21:01:28 2021

Previous thread: Newport by Copeysaurus21/2 21:04Sun Feb 21 21:04:45 2021view thread