ContinueWe use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website; if you continue without changing your settings - or dismiss this message - we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on Forums.Football Web Pages.co.uk

Borochat

Super proud sponsors of Alex Revell IDST

Return to front page

Newest article: Re: The Gary Smith era by SFCfoxToday 23:36Today at 23:36:11view thread

Oldest article: Today's games by BasingstokeBoro19/12/2020 15:51Sat Dec 19 15:51:33 2020view thread

MenuSearch

Next thread: Fielding by Hitchin Callling6/4 09:31Tue Apr 6 09:31:02 2021view thread

Re: For the FAO of Eazy (Private admin thread)

By Sev2/4 18:50Fri Apr 2 18:50:58 2021In response to Re: For the FAO of Eazy (Private admin thread)

Views: 793

Some example for clarity:

Calling a player shit because he missed 2 chances is a valid opinion. Commenting on their ability or their performance is an opinion about how they've played. That's what fans do.

Calling someone a spastic because they miss a penalty is unnecessarily vulgar and not a valid opinion, as the teo are not connected. It's personal abuse for no reason.

Calling someone an idiot because they've punched the ref in the 89th minute is fine because would be an opinion based on their actions and lack of intelligence.

Calling someone a paedophile because they made a mistake at the back and conceded a goal is again not appropriate.

It's mainly common sense.

reply to this article | return to the front page

6 people like this 6 people

Next article in this thread: Re: For the FAO of Eazy (Private admin thread) by Richie Rich C4/4 17:24Sun Apr 4 17:24:54 2021

Previous thread: Bradford city prediction by Bragbury1065/4 08:16Mon Apr 5 08:16:31 2021view thread