ContinueWe use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website; if you continue without changing your settings - or dismiss this message - we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on Forums.Football Web Pages.co.uk

Borochat

Super proud sponsors of Alex Revell IDST

Return to front page

Newest article: Re: Season ticket refunds by Old_manToday 13:58Today at 13:58:02view thread

Oldest article: Ronnie Henry Interview by Stevenage FC Interviews19/12/2020 02:08Sat Dec 19 02:08:38 2020view thread

MenuSearch

Reply to "Re: For the FAO of Eazy (Private admin thread)"

You must log in or register before you can post an article

return to the front page

Re: For the FAO of Eazy (Private admin thread)

By Sev2/4 18:50Fri Apr 2 18:50:58 2021In response to Re: For the FAO of Eazy (Private admin thread)

Views: 790

Some example for clarity:

Calling a player shit because he missed 2 chances is a valid opinion. Commenting on their ability or their performance is an opinion about how they've played. That's what fans do.

Calling someone a spastic because they miss a penalty is unnecessarily vulgar and not a valid opinion, as the teo are not connected. It's personal abuse for no reason.

Calling someone an idiot because they've punched the ref in the 89th minute is fine because would be an opinion based on their actions and lack of intelligence.

Calling someone a paedophile because they made a mistake at the back and conceded a goal is again not appropriate.

It's mainly common sense.