ContinueWe use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website; if you continue without changing your settings - or dismiss this message - we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on Forums.Football Web Pages.co.uk

Borochat

Super proud sponsors of Alex Revell IDST

Return to front page

Newest article: Re: New badge by TazToday 04:06Today at 04:06:40view thread

Oldest article: Swansea tickets by Stevo1/12/2020 09:00Tue Dec 1 09:00:33 2020view thread

MenuSearch

Next thread: Crawley by Rotterdamboro17/1 14:00Sun Jan 17 14:00:53 2021view thread

Match thread

By BasingstokeBoro16/1 14:17Sat Jan 16 14:17:26 2021

Views: 1397

Couple of changes!

Cummings
Coker
Wildin
Cuthbert
TVC
Carter
LIST
read
MARSH
Norris
Lines

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Fair result.

By WASP (Original Mr Wasp)16/1 16:53Sat Jan 16 16:53:02 2021In response to Match threadTop of thread

Views: 1005

Vaughan is a vile clunt.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Fair result.

By Freemo16/1 17:03Sat Jan 16 17:03:56 2021In response to Fair result.Top of thread

Views: 901

Us, Barrow and Scunthorpe all locked on one point per game (although that game apparently cannot be stopped), 0-0 between Grimsby and Southend the perfect result.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Fair result.

By Copeysaurus (CDawg)16/1 17:06Sat Jan 16 17:06:18 2021In response to Re: Fair result.Top of thread

Views: 906

I’m fairly relaxed. Tranmere are mid table and we are comfortably better than them

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Re: Fair result.

By AndyC17/1 00:01Sun Jan 17 00:01:36 2021In response to Re: Fair result.Top of thread

Views: 555

Clearly not better than them as we just drew with them at home

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Re: Fair result.

By Copeysaurus (CDawg)17/1 12:46Sun Jan 17 12:46:52 2021In response to Re: Fair result.Top of thread

Views: 345

Superb logic

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Fair result.

By AndyC17/1 14:30Sun Jan 17 14:30:46 2021In response to Re: Fair result.Top of thread

Views: 313

Thanks :-)

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Fair result.

By Owen B17/1 12:56Sun Jan 17 12:56:46 2021In response to Re: Fair result.Top of thread

Views: 328

Tbf, I laughed. I do agree with you that we look better now than we did a month ago and will pick up points if we carry on this way.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Fair result.

By Copeysaurus (CDawg)16/1 16:55Sat Jan 16 16:55:58 2021In response to Fair result.Top of thread

Views: 936

Yep, him and Clarke

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Fair result.

By Themessiah16/1 17:00Sat Jan 16 17:00:24 2021In response to Re: Fair result.Top of thread

Views: 888

Frustrating in the end

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Fair result.

By BasingstokeBoro16/1 16:54Sat Jan 16 16:54:00 2021In response to Fair result.Top of thread

Views: 920

Horrible horrible team.

reply to this article | return to the front page

SUBS PLEASE

By Copeysaurus (CDawg)16/1 16:27Sat Jan 16 16:27:00 2021In response to Match threadTop of thread

Views: 1011

No text

Edited by CDawg at 16:27:14 on 16th January 2021

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Re: SUBS PLEASE

By Ratman4616/1 16:30Sat Jan 16 16:30:55 2021In response to SUBS PLEASE Top of thread

Views: 984

How Marsh is playing ahead of Pett/Aitchison is a worry.

reply to this article | return to the front page

2 people like this 2 people

Re: SUBS PLEASE

By Junction 716/1 22:34Sat Jan 16 22:34:41 2021In response to Re: SUBS PLEASE Top of thread

Views: 526

Who knows how Revell thinks he hasn't got a scooby what he’s doing

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: SUBS PLEASE

By SFCfox17/1 07:10Sun Jan 17 07:10:07 2021In response to Re: SUBS PLEASE Top of thread

Views: 468

This was definitely down to Wilkins.

He has to go now surely

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: SUBS PLEASE

By Freemo16/1 23:36Sat Jan 16 23:36:03 2021In response to Re: SUBS PLEASE Top of thread

Views: 460

No he's good now, we all had a meeting about it and decided

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: SUBS PLEASE

By jayess16/1 17:19Sat Jan 16 17:19:18 2021In response to Re: SUBS PLEASE Top of thread

Views: 754

It's a complete mystery. I don't get how Marsh or List are in our best 11.

reply to this article | return to the front page

2 people like this 2 people

Re: SUBS PLEASE

By RockyBottom16/1 16:31Sat Jan 16 16:31:40 2021In response to Re: SUBS PLEASE Top of thread

Views: 963

Agreed, that would be my sub. Plus Smith for Read or probably Lines.

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Re: Match thread

By Copeysaurus (CDawg)16/1 15:58Sat Jan 16 15:58:34 2021In response to Match threadTop of thread

Views: 1031

Very average.

Aitchison, Pett and Newton on the bench I’m positive we can get a result

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Match thread

By RockyBottom16/1 16:23Sat Jan 16 16:23:05 2021In response to Re: Match threadTop of thread

Views: 944

Need to get a grip on this game for 15 mins now.

Is it just me that is really unimpressed by this ref?

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Match thread

By BasingstokeBoro16/1 16:54Sat Jan 16 16:54:29 2021In response to Re: Match threadTop of thread

Views: 854

Ref was shocking

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Re: Match thread

By Owen B16/1 16:55Sat Jan 16 16:55:50 2021In response to Re: Match threadTop of thread

Views: 862

I didn't actually think he was that bad. Had much worse.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Match thread

By Balders (BALDOCKBORO)16/1 20:57Sat Jan 16 20:57:06 2021In response to Re: Match threadTop of thread

Views: 533

Let the game flow, could have got the yellow out once when he didn't.

Failed to give us the late penalty but everyone else thinks it was soft so maybe I'm wrong.

I'd be happy for him to ref us again, above average for L2, I didn't shout at him once.

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Re: Match thread

By Owen B16/1 21:11Sat Jan 16 21:11:40 2021In response to Re: Match threadTop of thread

Views: 527

I thought we were generally quite good today. On another day we could have nicked a win.

Not a penalty for me, Clive.

We'll pick up points with performances like the last few weeks, so long as we don't revert to the shite before that.

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Re: Match thread

By Copeysaurus (CDawg)16/1 17:25Sat Jan 16 17:25:07 2021In response to Re: Match threadTop of thread

Views: 734

He let Tranmere off with a lot of bookable offences.

reply to this article | return to the front page

2 people like this 2 people

Re: Match thread

By AgentEves16/1 15:51Sat Jan 16 15:51:25 2021In response to Match threadTop of thread

Views: 1059

Not really much to say about that.

-Tranmere very physical and quick on the first touch.
-We've done well passing out from the back, even when under pressure.
-We've been sitting quite deep, but our counter attacking has been pretty good.
-List has been quiet, but hasn't been given an awful lot to work with.
-Marsh hasn't been great, but hasn't been awful. I'd rather Aitchison or Pett playing, but I suspect Marsh has been picked for his speed since we seem to be playing on the break.
-Game seems there for the taking. Neither team dominating.

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Re: Match thread

By RockyBottom16/1 15:54Sat Jan 16 15:54:52 2021In response to Re: Match threadTop of thread

Views: 1022

It's not a great game and teams are pretty even, but at least there is more evidence of some kind of game plan. A clear improvement on what we were seeing, but can't help feeling we need at least a point with our run of games coming up.

reply to this article | return to the front page

2 people like this 2 people

Re: Match thread

By Owen B16/1 15:31Sat Jan 16 15:31:28 2021In response to Match threadTop of thread

Views: 1116

Half an hour in and absolutely nothing of note has happened.

reply to this article | return to the front page

2 people like this 2 people

Re: Match thread

By AgentEves16/1 15:37Sat Jan 16 15:37:32 2021In response to Re: Match threadTop of thread

Views: 1081

I just thought the same thing. I'd usually have posted something by now, but there's not much to say really.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Match thread

By Bumble16/1 16:54Sat Jan 16 16:54:16 2021In response to Re: Match threadTop of thread

Views: 885

For me 2 points dropped
Got to win our home games

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Re: Match thread

By Rob SBFC (Big Robbie (SBFC))17/1 00:03Sun Jan 17 00:03:35 2021In response to Re: Match threadTop of thread

Views: 479

Brilliant point. How have you coped for the last 46 years or whatever since we last regularly did that? Or have you hoarded that nice bag of Moroccan hash we all needed over the last year??

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Match thread

By Jas7916/1 17:37Sat Jan 16 17:37:14 2021In response to Re: Match threadTop of thread

Views: 724

Normally yes, but with lack of crowd reducing any home advantage not sure it makes much difference, plus longest 2 trips out of the way.

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Re: Match thread

By Owen B16/1 15:40Sat Jan 16 15:40:16 2021In response to Re: Match threadTop of thread

Views: 1065

Current state: getting slightly annoyed by overlong replays of not much.

reply to this article | return to the front page

2 people like this 2 people

Re: Match thread

By AgentEves16/1 15:42Sat Jan 16 15:42:21 2021In response to Re: Match threadTop of thread

Views: 1067

Haha. Agreed. There was one earlier on of a pretty slow build up, but the replay was in slowmo. And it all culminated with a shot into row z nowhere near the goal. Painful.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Match thread

By Owen B16/1 15:43Sat Jan 16 15:43:48 2021In response to Re: Match threadTop of thread

Views: 1048

There was a replay that culminated in an attacking throw for us and missed the actual throw and it cut to a header at the keeper.

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Re: Match thread

By Freemo16/1 15:50Sat Jan 16 15:50:44 2021In response to Re: Match threadTop of thread

Views: 1018

This is not vintage but we've not played any worse than a mediocre side and there's options off the bench.

Imo Read and Lines looks our best midfield since the days we could call on whoever was fit from King, Lee, Schumacher and Tonge.

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Re: Match thread

By RockyBottom16/1 15:56Sat Jan 16 15:56:03 2021In response to Re: Match threadTop of thread

Views: 989

Really like Lines, shame he isn't 5 years younger.

Edited by RockyBottom at 15:56:12 on 16th January 2021

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Re: Match thread

By AgentEves16/1 16:13Sat Jan 16 16:13:08 2021In response to Re: Match threadTop of thread

Views: 940

But then he wouldn't be playing for us.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Match thread

By RockyBottom16/1 16:13Sat Jan 16 16:13:53 2021In response to Re: Match threadTop of thread

Views: 938

Very true.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Match thread

By Owen B16/1 15:53Sat Jan 16 15:53:38 2021In response to Re: Match threadTop of thread

Views: 999

We've looked pretty comfortable. Building up to them nicking a 92nd minute undeserved winner.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Match thread

By RockyBottom16/1 15:36Sat Jan 16 15:36:01 2021In response to Re: Match threadTop of thread

Views: 1073

Left side is poor.

Norris looks like he needs a goal.

My heart is in my mouth everytime Cuthbert is near the ball.

Lines looks promising again but missing Aitchison's creativity and Pett and Smith in midfield.

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Re: Match thread

By Themessiah16/1 15:51Sat Jan 16 15:51:42 2021In response to Re: Match threadTop of thread

Views: 999

Looking organised but nothing going forward need a reshuffle

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Match thread

By Ratman4616/1 15:48Sat Jan 16 15:48:38 2021In response to Re: Match threadTop of thread

Views: 1009

Not a fan of this setup, Carter on the right and Marsh on the left with List playing through the middle.

Would prefer Pett and Aitchison with Carter in the middle

reply to this article | return to the front page

2 people like this 2 people

Re: Match thread

By RockyBottom16/1 15:49Sat Jan 16 15:49:29 2021In response to Re: Match threadTop of thread

Views: 1006

Agreed.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Match thread

By Copeysaurus (CDawg)16/1 15:16Sat Jan 16 15:16:24 2021In response to Match threadTop of thread

Views: 1128

Well this has been shit

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Re: Match thread

By RockyBottom16/1 15:14Sat Jan 16 15:14:32 2021In response to Match threadTop of thread

Views: 1154

Not sure why Marsh is playing, but other than that makes sense.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Match thread

By AgentEves16/1 15:38Sat Jan 16 15:38:26 2021In response to Re: Match threadTop of thread

Views: 1050

Hasn't been great, either. Not awful, but we have better options.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Match thread

By RockyBottom16/1 15:48Sat Jan 16 15:48:53 2021In response to Re: Match threadTop of thread

Views: 1029

You feel like there could be a decent player in there somewhere, but his decision making is awful.

Edited by RockyBottom at 15:49:52 on 16th January 2021

reply to this article | return to the front page

2 people like this 2 people

Re: Match thread

By AgentEves16/1 16:21Sat Jan 16 16:21:47 2021In response to Re: Match threadTop of thread

Views: 911

Fair assessment.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Match thread

By WASP (Original Mr Wasp)16/1 14:50Sat Jan 16 14:50:29 2021In response to Match threadTop of thread

Views: 1168

I need List to get me back to the top of Boro fives.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Match thread

By Themessiah16/1 15:30Sat Jan 16 15:30:35 2021In response to Re: Match threadTop of thread

Views: 1097

Been shite so far

reply to this article | return to the front page

Previous thread: Rochdale (A) by Chet Manley14/1 11:44Thu Jan 14 11:44:11 2021view thread