We use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website; if you continue without changing your settings - or dismiss this message - we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on Forums.Football Web Pages.co.uk
Borochat
Super proud sponsors of Alex Revell IDST
Newest article: Re: Close season off topic fun. by BaldersToday 14:30Today at 14:30:07view thread
Oldest article: Boro Fives Table by Sev26/12/2020 17:27Sat Dec 26 17:27:23 2020view thread
Next thread: Crawley by Rotterdamboro17/1 14:00Sun Jan 17 14:00:53 2021view thread
Match thread
Views: 1503
Couple of changes!
Cummings
Coker
Wildin
Cuthbert
TVC
Carter
LIST
read
MARSH
Norris
Lines
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Fair result.
Views: 1006
Us, Barrow and Scunthorpe all locked on one point per game (although that game apparently cannot be stopped), 0-0 between Grimsby and Southend the perfect result.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Fair result.
Views: 1013
I’m fairly relaxed. Tranmere are mid table and we are comfortably better than them
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Fair result.
Views: 702
Clearly not better than them as we just drew with them at home
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Fair result.
Views: 431
Tbf, I laughed. I do agree with you that we look better now than we did a month ago and will pick up points if we carry on this way.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Fair result.
Views: 1020
Horrible horrible team.
reply to this article | return to the front page
SUBS PLEASE
Views: 1119
No text
Edited by CDawg at 16:27:14 on 16th January 2021
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: SUBS PLEASE
Views: 1091
How Marsh is playing ahead of Pett/Aitchison is a worry.
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: SUBS PLEASE
Views: 634
Who knows how Revell thinks he hasn't got a scooby what he’s doing
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: SUBS PLEASE
Views: 574
This was definitely down to Wilkins.
He has to go now surely
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: SUBS PLEASE
Views: 568
No he's good now, we all had a meeting about it and decided
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: SUBS PLEASE
Views: 851
It's a complete mystery. I don't get how Marsh or List are in our best 11.
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: SUBS PLEASE
Views: 1066
Agreed, that would be my sub. Plus Smith for Read or probably Lines.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Match thread
Views: 1133
Very average.
Aitchison, Pett and Newton on the bench I’m positive we can get a result
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match thread
Views: 1044
Need to get a grip on this game for 15 mins now.
Is it just me that is really unimpressed by this ref?
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match thread
Views: 964
Ref was shocking
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Match thread
Views: 968
I didn't actually think he was that bad. Had much worse.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match thread
Views: 640
Let the game flow, could have got the yellow out once when he didn't.
Failed to give us the late penalty but everyone else thinks it was soft so maybe I'm wrong.
I'd be happy for him to ref us again, above average for L2, I didn't shout at him once.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Match thread
Views: 629
I thought we were generally quite good today. On another day we could have nicked a win.
Not a penalty for me, Clive.
We'll pick up points with performances like the last few weeks, so long as we don't revert to the shite before that.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Match thread
Views: 836
He let Tranmere off with a lot of bookable offences.
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: Match thread
Views: 1159
Not really much to say about that.
-Tranmere very physical and quick on the first touch.
-We've done well passing out from the back, even when under pressure.
-We've been sitting quite deep, but our counter attacking has been pretty good.
-List has been quiet, but hasn't been given an awful lot to work with.
-Marsh hasn't been great, but hasn't been awful. I'd rather Aitchison or Pett playing, but I suspect Marsh has been picked for his speed since we seem to be playing on the break.
-Game seems there for the taking. Neither team dominating.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Match thread
Views: 1123
It's not a great game and teams are pretty even, but at least there is more evidence of some kind of game plan. A clear improvement on what we were seeing, but can't help feeling we need at least a point with our run of games coming up.
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: Match thread
Views: 1221
Half an hour in and absolutely nothing of note has happened.
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: Match thread
Views: 1181
I just thought the same thing. I'd usually have posted something by now, but there's not much to say really.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match thread
Views: 991
For me 2 points dropped
Got to win our home games
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Match thread
Views: 644
Brilliant point. How have you coped for the last 46 years or whatever since we last regularly did that? Or have you hoarded that nice bag of Moroccan hash we all needed over the last year??
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match thread
Views: 828
Normally yes, but with lack of crowd reducing any home advantage not sure it makes much difference, plus longest 2 trips out of the way.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Match thread
Views: 1163
Current state: getting slightly annoyed by overlong replays of not much.
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: Match thread
Views: 1166
Haha. Agreed. There was one earlier on of a pretty slow build up, but the replay was in slowmo. And it all culminated with a shot into row z nowhere near the goal. Painful.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match thread
Views: 1149
There was a replay that culminated in an attacking throw for us and missed the actual throw and it cut to a header at the keeper.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Match thread
Views: 1119
This is not vintage but we've not played any worse than a mediocre side and there's options off the bench.
Imo Read and Lines looks our best midfield since the days we could call on whoever was fit from King, Lee, Schumacher and Tonge.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Match thread
Views: 1084
Really like Lines, shame he isn't 5 years younger.
Edited by RockyBottom at 15:56:12 on 16th January 2021
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Match thread
Views: 1039
But then he wouldn't be playing for us.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match thread
Views: 1100
We've looked pretty comfortable. Building up to them nicking a 92nd minute undeserved winner.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match thread
Views: 1173
Left side is poor.
Norris looks like he needs a goal.
My heart is in my mouth everytime Cuthbert is near the ball.
Lines looks promising again but missing Aitchison's creativity and Pett and Smith in midfield.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Match thread
Views: 1101
Looking organised but nothing going forward need a reshuffle
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match thread
Views: 1113
Not a fan of this setup, Carter on the right and Marsh on the left with List playing through the middle.
Would prefer Pett and Aitchison with Carter in the middle
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: Match thread
Views: 1232
Well this has been shit
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Match thread
Views: 1253
Not sure why Marsh is playing, but other than that makes sense.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match thread
Views: 1151
Hasn't been great, either. Not awful, but we have better options.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match thread
Views: 1132
You feel like there could be a decent player in there somewhere, but his decision making is awful.
Edited by RockyBottom at 15:49:52 on 16th January 2021
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: Match thread
Views: 1270
I need List to get me back to the top of Boro fives.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Previous thread: Rochdale (A) by Chet Manley14/1 11:44Thu Jan 14 11:44:11 2021view thread