ContinueWe use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website; if you continue without changing your settings - or dismiss this message - we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on Forums.Football Web

Return to front page

Newest article: Re: More publicity by Baden 9 KreuzerYesterday 23:11Yesterday at 23:11:42view thread

Oldest article: Fixtures and Results by Moderator14/2/2015 11:54Sat Feb 14 11:54:00 2015view thread


Next thread: Ah well by ,shifter11/7 21:48Wed Jul 11 21:48:14 2018view thread

Re: Post on Facebook

By Greg (NBFC)10/7 11:07Tue Jul 10 11:07:49 2018In response to Re: Post on Facebook

Views: 1107

I suppose that depends on the nature of the deal. Maybe I misunderstood, but I believe the deal is that Boro simply hire the ground for the time they need to use it, and NS was also looking for other avenues to charge people (eg Nuns) to use it on a similar basis. If that's the case, then NS is responsible for ensuring that there is access.

Of course, it may be that the agreement is as it was under the previous ground owners, where Boro effectively "sublet" to the Nuns for them to play there. In that case, Nuns and Boro need to reach an agreement.

Do we know for certain which of these scenarios applies (or even if neither applies)?

reply to this article | return to the front page

Next article in this thread: Re: Post on Facebook by Hullablue10/7 11:39Tue Jul 10 11:39:02 2018

Previous thread: Squad so far (confirmed) by Moley8511/7 11:36Wed Jul 11 11:36:22 2018view thread

The forum or any messages are not and should not be interpreted as an official announcement from Nuneaton Borough FC or anyone associated with Nuneaton Borough FC. Nuneaton Borough FC will not accept responsibility for any messages posted in the forum. Please refrain from bad language.