Return to front page

Newest article: Re: and another by BoropodToday 16:05Today at 16:05:07view thread

Oldest article: Let the inquiry begin by Armchair vulture18/1 15:11Thu Jan 18 15:11:44 2024view thread

MenuSearch

Next thread: Huge choice to be made / make or break time by KB1/2 19:15Thu Feb 1 19:15:58 2024view thread

Re: Meeting

By VoR30/1 22:25Tue Jan 30 22:25:59 2024In response to Re: Meeting

Views: 922

It's difficult to believe that a group of business people would not have prioritised the bills to be paid.

There are remedies for breaches of a lease agreement.

The tenant knows his obligations under a lease & the landlord can point out potential breaches.

It doesn't have to lead to what has happened at LW.

It begs the question as to whether AT just sat quietly by & were in some way complicit in the end result?

I doubt that we will ever know the truth?

Also, Gustavus has commented tonight to the effect that AT never asked JG to go, so that raises another question...what is the real truth?

Edited by VoR at 22:27:00 on 30th January 2024

reply to this article | return to the front page

Next article in this thread: Re: Meeting by VS Griff30/1 22:32Tue Jan 30 22:32:57 2024

Previous thread: January 200 Club Draw by Anonymous2/2 19:00Fri Feb 2 19:00:02 2024view thread