Return to front page

Newest article: Re: April 200 Club draw result by Unnamed Sauce8/5 19:41Wed May 8 19:41:11 2024view thread

Oldest article: Cam McWilliams by MJNB8/1 21:11Mon Jan 8 21:11:02 2024view thread

MenuSearch

Next thread: Chesterfield by bert's dad6/2 08:15Tue Feb 6 08:15:05 2024view thread

Re: Non league paper

By VoR4/2 16:27Sun Feb 4 16:27:00 2024In response to Re: Non league paper

Views: 728

Andy Walsh I believe is refering to a new club wishing to adopt the name of the old club (a Bury situation).

The NLP article relates to the FA's immediate position.

If Boro Leisure were no longer in existence on 31st March, then the FA could identify with AFC Nuneaton as being a continuation of the old club (but not in name) & place AFC Nuneaton at a higher level.

If Boro Leisure are still in existence on 31st March, then the FA could consider AFC Nuneaton as being a completely new club at place them at a lower level.

I think this is JE's concern with GH's proposals, because the reality is that Boro Leisure will still be in existence on 31st March.

It is an FA technicality.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Next article in this thread: Re: Non league paper by The_Hullablue4/2 16:29Sun Feb 4 16:29:51 2024

Previous thread: UK Government White Paper on introducing a Football Regulator by VoR5/2 09:03Mon Feb 5 09:03:53 2024view thread