Return to front page

Newest article: Re: Any game today? by Unnamed SauceYesterday 22:00Yesterday at 22:00:29view thread

Oldest article: Have we considered setting up our new club as a fr… by VoR31/1 07:52Wed Jan 31 07:52:57 2024view thread

MenuSearch

Next thread: Rich Lavery to Barwell?? by s. tone ragma715/2 23:38Thu Feb 15 23:38:11 2024view thread

Re: H&H = BS Central

By VS Dysfunctional (VS Boro)11/2 11:04Sun Feb 11 11:04:38 2024In response to Re: H&H = BS Central

Views: 793

I think the SE sponsorship is a complex issue. He also sponsors Bedworth (and I believe Barwell).

With respect to Hinckley Road. Boro Leisure discounted this (and Rugby) due to cost. Have they dropped their demands?

Shame H&H can't join forces with the new initiative. Not wanting to be part seems to indicate "it's my way, or no way".
(I hope) the new initiative have a board with equal rights and (difficult I know) that this is respected and not dictated by those with most money*

There is a lot of talk about the council. Times have changed, and my best hope would for the council to pay for a facility available to all BUT get someone private to run it for them. This could open the way for a mens football team to rent it.

I was very "not bothered" about a new club (in any guise), but I am slightly more enthusiastic now.

* I still claim the biggest "investors" are those who pay at the turnstile. 200 paying (say) £5 is £21,000pa.

>>>> Former Nuneaton Boro fan <<<<

reply to this article | return to the front page

Next article in this thread: Re: H&H = BS Central by Camp hill reserves 11/2 11:12Sun Feb 11 11:12:21 2024

Previous thread: Coop statement by VS Dysfunctional13/2 17:03Tue Feb 13 17:03:13 2024view thread