Return to front page

Newest article: Re: Any game today? by Unnamed SauceYesterday 22:00Yesterday at 22:00:29view thread

Oldest article: Have we considered setting up our new club as a fr… by VoR31/1 07:52Wed Jan 31 07:52:57 2024view thread

MenuSearch

Next thread: Ass covering by stripes4me20/5 11:17Mon May 20 11:17:03 2024view thread

Re: Hinckley Leicester Road

By VS Dysfunctional (VS Boro)17/2 14:10Sat Feb 17 14:10:48 2024In response to Re: Hinckley Leicester Road

Views: 965

My understanding is
a) the coop backed initiative will be run by sponsors and include the coop from day 1.
b) the coop constitution will be such that getting into debt (deficit) will be difficult.
c) the coop initiative will probably/possibly not be as successful on the field initially, but has far more longevity.

as things stand.
1) Neither initiative have a ground to play on anywhere.
2) One has support of previous local sponsors; the other does not.
3) One talks about national sponsors, but not substance to this claim.
4) One has dreams of the FL, the other does not.
5) One has decided on the kit; the other has not.
6) One has support and advice from expert(s) the other has support from NBFC secretary.

I see not much more from one initiative than I saw from Hawkins other than they own a business.
At least when JG came on board there was confidence he could (and did) attract sponsorship that was neglected by Thorn. How did that end?

>>>> Former Nuneaton Boro fan <<<<

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Next article in this thread: for balance by DJ_Hinckley17/2 10:12Sat Feb 17 10:12:14 2024

Previous thread: Some Big Name clubs by VS City17/5 15:05Fri May 17 15:05:38 2024view thread