Return to front page

Newest article: Re: That's a "no" then? by Lord of the Manor I'mToday 03:33Today at 03:33:35view thread

Oldest article: Kane Richards by s. tone ragma79/2/2024 19:13Fri Feb 9 19:13:38 2024view thread

MenuSearch

Next thread: Cam Mcwilliams by s. tone ragma724/2/2024 18:30Sat Feb 24 18:30:05 2024view thread

Re: Torquay

By VS Dysfunctional (VS Boro)22/2/2024 19:46Thu Feb 22 19:46:34 2024In response to Re: Torquay

Views: 844

Difference being “living within means”.
Constitution and articles (should) mean profit/loss will be defined as surplus/deficit with rules and regulations on how that has to be addressed.

How has it worked with Ian Neale/lee thorn/nick Hawkins/Jimmy ginnelly “funding” their vanity project whilst ignoring and treating the biggest financial backers (the supporters) with contempt?

With what looks like the only option those who pay to watch have the opportunity to have influence and a voice

>>>> Former Nuneaton Boro fan <<<<

Edited by VS Boro at 19:49:06 on 22nd February 2024

reply to this article | return to the front page

Next article in this thread: Re: Torquay by Camp hill reserves 22/2/2024 19:01Thu Feb 22 19:01:50 2024

Previous thread: JG is back by s. tone ragma716/2/2024 09:27Fri Feb 16 09:27:04 2024view thread