Return to front page

Newest article: Re: Tomorrow- in doubt? by MJNBToday 09:13Today at 09:13:25view thread

Oldest article: Free admission at Solihull by Dougie830/1 18:37Tue Jan 30 18:37:40 2024view thread

MenuSearch

Next thread: 𝐂𝐋𝐔𝐁 𝐁𝐀𝐃𝐆𝐄 π•πŽπ“π„ & πŽππ„π πŒπ„π„π“πˆππ† by mark-nbfc6/3 11:59Wed Mar 6 11:59:42 2024view thread

Re: The demise of Nuneaton Borough FC

By VS Dysfunctional (VS Boro)2/3 11:53Sat Mar 2 11:53:06 2024In response to Re: The demise of Nuneaton Borough FC

Views: 836

Technically they must have*

Sponsors is when (usually money**) is passed over in return for advertisement.
The bigger the presence the higher the cost.

* ignoring only 30% of return on sponsorship.
** some is β€œbenefit in kind”.

The sponsorship money is paid; advertisement is returned and the buisiness spends the income as feels fit.

For a sponsor to demand where the money is spent is foolish IMO.

>>>> Former Nuneaton Boro fan <<<<

reply to this article | return to the front page

Next article in this thread: Re: The demise of Nuneaton Borough FC by bert's dad2/3 11:57Sat Mar 2 11:57:21 2024

Previous thread: Player’s wages !! by Vernon227/2 18:29Tue Feb 27 18:29:54 2024view thread