Return to front page

Newest article: Why we stiil need to follow the boys by Unnamed SauceToday 12:35Today at 12:35:52view thread

Oldest article: Free admission at Solihull by Dougie830/1 18:37Tue Jan 30 18:37:40 2024view thread

MenuSearch

Next thread: Away Stewarding Support by StockingfordBrew1/9 21:31Sun Sep 1 21:31:52 2024view thread

Re: Dummy spat out by football group then

By Breadline (Helpline......999)19/5 17:52Sun May 19 17:52:10 2024In response to Dummy spat out by football group then

Views: 1457

As I've always suggested, fans are fickle, I'm a fan. The most prominent issue stands out massively, lack of transparency, due diligence, consistency trust, democracy. The sub group would have been very happy to review any party that could take our new club to the next levels. The sub group stuck to a rigid & professional process that proved successful & respected by the candidates.
Read the statement, don't chastise the sub group. There is no dummy out the pram scenario. The board says a full process was carried out, ABSOLUTELY INCORRECT. Had these CV's been presented, in the appropriate time period, they would respectfully have been sifted with all the other candidates and processes respectfully. The group have no issues with the individuals named as managers. It's about the correct process.

Edited by Helpline......999 at 17:52:59 on 19th May 2024
Edited by Helpline......999 at 18:33:34 on 19th May 2024

reply to this article | return to the front page

Next article in this thread: Re: Dummy spat out by football group then by s. tone ragma719/5 18:16Sun May 19 18:16:55 2024

Previous thread: Through the Turnstiles of Non League Football article by mark-nbfc2/9 08:46Mon Sep 2 08:46:52 2024view thread