Return to front page

Newest article: Re: FAO: Bertsdad by bert's dadYesterday 23:30Yesterday at 23:30:58view thread

Oldest article: Free admission at Solihull by Dougie830/1 18:37Tue Jan 30 18:37:40 2024view thread

MenuSearch

Next thread: Away Stewarding Support by StockingfordBrew1/9 21:31Sun Sep 1 21:31:52 2024view thread

Re: The truth the fans deserve

By VS City (VS Boro)19/5 21:12Sun May 19 21:12:59 2024In response to Re: The truth the fans deserve

Views: 1281

The person who has been appointed did not apply for the Job OR was considered by the sub-committee.


Normal practice is if something is vetoed either the 2nd or 3rd choice is accepted OR the process starts again.

If names were spouted about before hand, thats not good (whether that spouted by the board or the sub-group). As is "We were further surprised to be informed that non-voting members of the board had also influenced the process" (but that may be nothing; but why say).

"Hello; this is our recommendation based on pre-agreed criteria".
"Don't worry about it, I had a word with my mate and he is going to be manager"

I have no idea if the recommendation was presented to the board then another was sought by the board OR the board had gone alone before process was complete.

>>>> Former Nuneaton Boro fan <<<<

reply to this article | return to the front page

Next article in this thread: Re: The truth the fans deserve by The_Hullablue19/5 21:19Sun May 19 21:19:00 2024

Previous thread: Through the Turnstiles of Non League Football article by mark-nbfc2/9 08:46Mon Sep 2 08:46:52 2024view thread