Return to front page

Newest article: Re: Disconsent by JebbsToday 20:01Today at 20:01:01view thread

Oldest article: Prince Mancinelli by VoR18/1 10:11Thu Jan 18 10:11:57 2024view thread

MenuSearch

Next thread: Fuss over nothing by almost average 225/5 14:26Sat May 25 14:26:16 2024view thread

Re: Club Statement

By The_Hullablue21/5 17:24Tue May 21 17:24:47 2024In response to Re: Club Statement

Views: 837

Derek posted on both forums about his reasons for it.

Seeing as I do not know who the others were, I cannot comment on if all of then agreed to his version.

I do know though that he has not been able to offer explanation as to what the board did that was outside the remit/agreements etc with the subcommittee.

It seems from DD's own admission, the subcommittee knew that the board was not going to just runberstamp the subcommittee's recommendation and that the board had never said that if the subcommittee recommendation was not deemed acceptable they would ask the subcommittee to go through the process again.

So, in short, despite Derek making several posts, his story is very light on details and facts, and heavy on accusations he has not been able to back up.

-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
How bright should floodlights be in the Conference?

Edited by The_Hullablue at 17:25:40 on 21st May 2024

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Next article in this thread: Re: Club Statement by ManorParkBlue21/5 18:21Tue May 21 18:21:45 2024

Previous thread: A Retraction by Unnamed Sauce22/5 23:46Wed May 22 23:46:09 2024view thread