Return to front page

Newest article: Re: Most enjoyable-again by BoropodYesterday 20:33Yesterday at 20:33:19view thread

Oldest article: Talking is over, actions are needed by Boro boy31/1/2024 22:12Wed Jan 31 22:12:26 2024view thread

MenuSearch

Next thread: Away Stewarding Support by StockingfordBrew1/9/2024 21:31Sun Sep 1 21:31:52 2024view thread

Re: SHOCKED +1

By VS City (VS Boro)22/5/2024 22:17Wed May 22 22:17:27 2024In response to Re: SHOCKED +1

Views: 980

What I saw at 8:30pm was on available to anyone (i've just gone back and it's not now - which confuses/surprises me).

To quote the above statement "The process we were asked to undertake was fully transparent, accountable and rigorous". This clearly was not the case.

The candidate may have fit-the-bill from a footballing point of view, but there is more to being a manager of a community club than that.


What I have seen tonight has totally changed my view. Whilst I may not totally agree with the Acton selection process I can 100% see why the board did not have confidence in the subcommittee to miss something so important for a all embracing community football club.

>>>> Former Nuneaton Boro fan <<<<

Edited by VS Boro at 22:19:42 on 22nd May 2024

reply to this article | return to the front page

Next article in this thread: Re: The truth the fans deserve by s. tone ragma720/5/2024 08:06Mon May 20 08:06:21 2024

Previous thread: Through the Turnstiles of Non League Football article by mark-nbfc2/9/2024 08:46Mon Sep 2 08:46:52 2024view thread