Return to front page

Newest article: Re: Disconsent by mark-nbfcYesterday 20:52Yesterday at 20:52:05view thread

Oldest article: Prince Mancinelli by VoR18/1 10:11Thu Jan 18 10:11:57 2024view thread

MenuSearch

Next thread: Statement by VS City23/5 16:11Thu May 23 16:11:40 2024view thread

Re: SHOCKED +1

By Jebbs23/5 11:20Thu May 23 11:20:06 2024In response to Re: SHOCKED +1

Views: 383

The process we were asked to undertake was fully transparent, accountable and rigorous. The interview process was scored as requested by the board

This interview scoring process that the Board asked you to do... as part of this was there a request by the Board that the Sub Group were do go through candidates social media?
Or was it a matter of football related (CV, experience, their presentation etc) scoring that you had been requested to do for the Board.

Wasn't it at the meeting the Sub Group had planned with the Board the time due diligence was to take place as requested by the Board?

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Next article in this thread: Re: SHOCKED +1 by Breadline23/5 11:53Thu May 23 11:53:24 2024

Previous thread: Who will we be facing next season? by mark-nbfc23/5 08:05Thu May 23 08:05:34 2024view thread