Return to front page

Newest article: Re: Um.. by almost average 2Yesterday 16:41Yesterday at 16:41:26view thread

Oldest article: Council statement by Shrewblue24/1 14:52Wed Jan 24 14:52:06 2024view thread

MenuSearch

Next thread: Away Stewarding Support by StockingfordBrew1/9 21:31Sun Sep 1 21:31:52 2024view thread

Re: SHOCKED +1

By Jebbs23/5 11:20Thu May 23 11:20:06 2024In response to Re: SHOCKED +1

Views: 716

The process we were asked to undertake was fully transparent, accountable and rigorous. The interview process was scored as requested by the board

This interview scoring process that the Board asked you to do... as part of this was there a request by the Board that the Sub Group were do go through candidates social media?
Or was it a matter of football related (CV, experience, their presentation etc) scoring that you had been requested to do for the Board.

Wasn't it at the meeting the Sub Group had planned with the Board the time due diligence was to take place as requested by the Board?

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Next article in this thread: Re: SHOCKED +1 by Breadline23/5 11:53Thu May 23 11:53:24 2024

Previous thread: Through the Turnstiles of Non League Football article by mark-nbfc2/9 08:46Mon Sep 2 08:46:52 2024view thread