Return to front page

Newest article: Re: Lichfield cup game tonight by Lord of the Manor I'mToday 17:14Today at 17:14:22view thread

Oldest article: Free admission at Solihull by Dougie830/1 18:37Tue Jan 30 18:37:40 2024view thread

MenuSearch

Next thread: Away Stewarding Support by StockingfordBrew1/9 21:31Sun Sep 1 21:31:52 2024view thread

Re: SHOCKED +1

By Jebbs23/5 14:21Thu May 23 14:21:14 2024In response to Re: SHOCKED +1

Views: 654

Many companies, particularly those appointing someone in high profile positions check social media as a matter of course.

They did VS.
The company appointing someone absolutely did what you said.

If anything 'good' has come from this it's the way the process worked up that that point. Everyone should feel proud.
Sub Group tasked to find preferred candidates through footballing cv etc and then passing on the info to the Club.
Club then does some scrunity (as you'd expect a company that is planning on appointing someone would) and makes a decision on whatever is or isn't found under that scrutiny.
In this case they found something that wasn't inline with the principles of the CIC so didn't appoint him.
Absolutely brilliant work from both the Sub Group and the Football Club Board in my opinion.

reply to this article | return to the front page

3 people like this 3 people

Next article in this thread: Re: SHOCKED +1 by The_Hullablue23/5 13:28Thu May 23 13:28:59 2024

Previous thread: Through the Turnstiles of Non League Football article by mark-nbfc2/9 08:46Mon Sep 2 08:46:52 2024view thread