Return to front page

Newest article: Re: Most enjoyable-again by BoropodYesterday 20:33Yesterday at 20:33:19view thread

Oldest article: Talking is over, actions are needed by Boro boy31/1/2024 22:12Wed Jan 31 22:12:26 2024view thread

MenuSearch

Next thread: Away Stewarding Support by StockingfordBrew1/9/2024 21:31Sun Sep 1 21:31:52 2024view thread

Re: SHOCKED +1

By Jebbs23/5/2024 14:21Thu May 23 14:21:14 2024In response to Re: SHOCKED +1

Views: 715

Many companies, particularly those appointing someone in high profile positions check social media as a matter of course.

They did VS.
The company appointing someone absolutely did what you said.

If anything 'good' has come from this it's the way the process worked up that that point. Everyone should feel proud.
Sub Group tasked to find preferred candidates through footballing cv etc and then passing on the info to the Club.
Club then does some scrunity (as you'd expect a company that is planning on appointing someone would) and makes a decision on whatever is or isn't found under that scrutiny.
In this case they found something that wasn't inline with the principles of the CIC so didn't appoint him.
Absolutely brilliant work from both the Sub Group and the Football Club Board in my opinion.

reply to this article | return to the front page

3 people like this 3 people

Next article in this thread: Re: SHOCKED +1 by The_Hullablue23/5/2024 13:28Thu May 23 13:28:59 2024

Previous thread: Through the Turnstiles of Non League Football article by mark-nbfc2/9/2024 08:46Mon Sep 2 08:46:52 2024view thread