Return to front page

Newest article: Re: Latest signing by The_HullablueYesterday 16:57Yesterday at 16:57:23view thread

Oldest article: FA Vase winners 2027-28 by Camp hill reserves 18/1 16:30Thu Jan 18 16:30:49 2024view thread

MenuSearch

Next thread: Statement by VS City23/5 16:11Thu May 23 16:11:40 2024view thread

Re: SHOCKED +1

By Jebbs23/5 14:21Thu May 23 14:21:14 2024In response to Re: SHOCKED +1

Views: 272

Many companies, particularly those appointing someone in high profile positions check social media as a matter of course.

They did VS.
The company appointing someone absolutely did what you said.

If anything 'good' has come from this it's the way the process worked up that that point. Everyone should feel proud.
Sub Group tasked to find preferred candidates through footballing cv etc and then passing on the info to the Club.
Club then does some scrunity (as you'd expect a company that is planning on appointing someone would) and makes a decision on whatever is or isn't found under that scrutiny.
In this case they found something that wasn't inline with the principles of the CIC so didn't appoint him.
Absolutely brilliant work from both the Sub Group and the Football Club Board in my opinion.

reply to this article | return to the front page

3 people like this 3 people

Next article in this thread: Re: SHOCKED +1 by The_Hullablue23/5 13:28Thu May 23 13:28:59 2024

Previous thread: Who will we be facing next season? by mark-nbfc23/5 08:05Thu May 23 08:05:34 2024view thread