Return to front page

Newest article: Re: FAO: Bertsdad by bert's dadYesterday 23:30Yesterday at 23:30:58view thread

Oldest article: Free admission at Solihull by Dougie830/1 18:37Tue Jan 30 18:37:40 2024view thread

MenuSearch

Next thread: Coach to Bridgenorth. by Dougie814/9 09:23Sat Sep 14 09:23:54 2024view thread

Re: LW is not the only option for a return to town

By VS City (VS Boro)8/9 17:54Sun Sep 8 17:54:11 2024In response to Re: LW is not the only option for a return to town

Views: 1153

I’ve always championed 3G pitches at the level boro would realistically expect themselves to play on.

I know the ground has flooded a few times; but it’s pretty rare. I have no idea what damage would be done. It may be possible to raise a meter when installing - clubs like Rushall and Tamworth both levelled the pitch and with the former at least it was certainly raised and not lowered.

With “rugby/football” club relations.
At the time of the move the football club held all the cards.
Even after the football club reformed it did as it was still the land owner.

Things are different now with both on par and needing something.
* Nuns - pitch by clubhouse.
* Boro - pitch in Nuneaton.

The ground has a pitch (work needed) two covered ends; a club house and changing rooms.. surely something can be worked out.

>>>> Former Nuneaton Boro fan <<<<

reply to this article | return to the front page

2 people like this 2 people

Next article in this thread: Re: LW is not the only option for a return to town by StockingfordBrew8/9 17:08Sun Sep 8 17:08:37 2024

Previous thread: Treasurer report by almost average 213/9 17:16Fri Sep 13 17:16:44 2024view thread