Time for plain speaking
Views: 610
FWIW
...Don't give a fuck about Jimmy Ginnelly, Greg Kazaboni, Armchair Vulture or anyone else from the past , tbh.. Never spoken to any of them, never will. Don't know what they look like. Don't care. They can take their life journey in one direction from now on and I'll take mine. Don't give a fuck either, about who does and doesn't turn up at The Oval. (Although some absences this season are HUGELY appreciated). By all means stay away from following the BoroTown forever. But hey! Do the rest of us a favour eh? And stop banging on and on and ON about it.
I have really enjoyed this season. By comparison the last three or four have been utter shite. 857 last saturday suggests that the gloaters and ghouls are not really all that missed and are certainly not needed. If they could do us the additional favour though also, of staying away from the Forum, and desist from raking up the same old boring muck up, in a (vain) attempt to spoil the party and dilute the current good feeling about the "new" (lol!) club, why that would be an additional bonus.
(Stands back and awaits the vilification).
reply to this article | return to the front page
10 people
Next article in this thread: Re: Time for plain speaking by Armchair vulture1/4 21:12Tue Apr 1 21:12:23 2025
Time for plain speaking by Unnamed Sauce1/4 20:07Tue Apr 1 20:07:00 2025 10 peopleview thread- Re: Time for plain speaking by Armchair vulture1/4 21:12Tue Apr 1 21:12:23 2025 5 people
- Re: Time for plain speaking by MJNB2/4 16:03Wed Apr 2 16:03:53 2025 4 people
- Re: Time for plain speaking by bert's dadYesterday 10:44Yesterday at 10:44:27
- Re: Time for plain speaking by VoRYesterday 12:04Yesterday at 12:04:29 1 person
- That's a "no" then? by Unnamed Sauce1/4 22:07Tue Apr 1 22:07:12 2025 3 people
- Re: That's a "no" then? by Armchair vulture2/4 21:07Wed Apr 2 21:07:11 2025 1 person
- Re: That's a "no" then? by Lord of the Manor I'mYesterday 06:15Yesterday at 06:15:46 1 person
- Re: That's a "no" then? by almost average 2Yesterday 06:25Yesterday at 06:25:36 1 person
- Re: That's a "no" then? by MJNBYesterday 10:08Yesterday at 10:08:31
- Re: That's a "no" then? by almost average 2Yesterday 14:42Yesterday at 14:42:32
- Re: That's a "no" then? by Lord of the Manor I'mToday 03:33Today at 03:33:35
- Re: That's a "no" then? by bert's dadToday 10:11Today at 10:11:43
- Re: That's a "no" then? by VoRToday 11:06Today at 11:06:37
- Re: That's a "no" then? by Vernon2Today 11:17Today at 11:17:54
- Re: That's a "no" then? by VoRToday 11:27Today at 11:27:12
- Re: That's a "no" then? by Vernon2Today 12:11Today at 12:11:20
- Re: That's a "no" then? by Lord of the Manor I'mToday 12:29Today at 12:29:28
- Re: That's a "no" then? by Lord of the Manor I'mToday 12:29Today at 12:29:04
- Re: That's a "no" then? by VoRToday 12:22Today at 12:22:48
- Re: That's a "no" then? by GustavusYesterday 10:46Yesterday at 10:46:14 3 people
- Re: That's a "no" then? by 70s Stalwart (v2)Yesterday 10:19Yesterday at 10:19:37
- Re: That's a "no" then? by MJNBYesterday 10:55Yesterday at 10:55:51
- Re: That's a "no" then? by mark-nbfcYesterday 10:58Yesterday at 10:58:25 3 people
- Re: That's a "no" then? by joetownyYesterday 12:57Yesterday at 12:57:26 1 person
- Re: That's a "no" then? by joetownyYesterday 08:49Yesterday at 08:49:30 2 people