Re: That's a "no" then?
Views: 551
Fair comment. I didn’t dare say it before we achieved it but I think it would have been a huge setback if we hadn’t gone up this season.
I think it’s important to remember at all times that this time last year we were worried we wouldn’t have a Club to support. There was the shambles of the H&H bid, no ground and false hopes about Gala Fields.
People were sat in a room scratching their heads about coming up with solutions to save a good standard of football for Nuneaton.
Given those challenges and starting the playing side from scratch with appointment of managerial team and finding players. It’s been a fantastic achievement.
I love memories of Manor Park. The antics of Neale and Thorn and their disregard for the town of Nuneaton disillusioned me for a long time. But this is a fresh start and whilst it’s ok to remember Boro of old we don’t want the Neale reputational legacy or the debts Boro leisure still holds or it’s angry creditors who are rightly concerned about what they are owed.
Onwards!
Edited by Gustavus at 10:46:44 on 3rd April 2025
Edited by Gustavus at 10:50:21 on 3rd April 2025
reply to this article | return to the front page
3 people
Next article in this thread: Re: That's a "no" then? by 70s Stalwart (v2)3/4 10:19Thu Apr 3 10:19:37 2025
Time for plain speaking by Unnamed Sauce1/4 20:07Tue Apr 1 20:07:00 2025
10 peopleview thread
- Re: Time for plain speaking by Snappycroc UTT12/4 00:54Sat Apr 12 00:54:27 2025
- Re: Time for plain speaking by Armchair vulture1/4 21:12Tue Apr 1 21:12:23 2025
5 people
- Re: Time for plain speaking by MJNB2/4 16:03Wed Apr 2 16:03:53 2025
4 people
- Re: Time for plain speaking by bert's dad3/4 10:44Thu Apr 3 10:44:27 2025
- Re: Time for plain speaking by VoR3/4 12:04Thu Apr 3 12:04:29 2025
1 person
- That's a "no" then? by Unnamed Sauce1/4 22:07Tue Apr 1 22:07:12 2025
3 people
- Re: That's a "no" then? by Armchair vulture2/4 21:07Wed Apr 2 21:07:11 2025
1 person
- Re: That's a "no" then? by Lord of the Manor I'm3/4 06:15Thu Apr 3 06:15:46 2025
2 people
- Re: That's a "no" then? by almost average 23/4 06:25Thu Apr 3 06:25:36 2025
2 people
- Re: That's a "no" then? by MJNB3/4 10:08Thu Apr 3 10:08:31 2025
- Re: That's a "no" then? by almost average 23/4 14:42Thu Apr 3 14:42:32 2025
- Re: That's a "no" then? by Lord of the Manor I'm4/4 03:33Fri Apr 4 03:33:35 2025
- Re: That's a "no" then? by bert's dad4/4 10:11Fri Apr 4 10:11:43 2025
- Re: That's a "no" then? by VoR4/4 11:06Fri Apr 4 11:06:37 2025
- Re: That's a "no" then? by bert's dad4/4 20:39Fri Apr 4 20:39:58 2025
- Re: That's a "no" then? by VoR4/4 20:45Fri Apr 4 20:45:30 2025
- Re: That's a "no" then? by bert's dad5/4 11:11Sat Apr 5 11:11:27 2025
- Re: That's a "no" then? by Wotnostrikers4/4 21:44Fri Apr 4 21:44:23 2025
1 person
- Re: That's a "no" then? by Vernon24/4 11:17Fri Apr 4 11:17:54 2025
1 person
- Re: That's a "no" then? by VoR4/4 11:27Fri Apr 4 11:27:12 2025
- Re: That's a "no" then? by Vernon24/4 12:11Fri Apr 4 12:11:20 2025
- Re: That's a "no" then? by Lord of the Manor I'm4/4 12:29Fri Apr 4 12:29:28 2025
- Re: That's a "no" then? by Lord of the Manor I'm4/4 12:29Fri Apr 4 12:29:04 2025
- Re: That's a "no" then? by VoR4/4 12:22Fri Apr 4 12:22:48 2025
- Re: That's a "no" then? by Gustavus3/4 10:46Thu Apr 3 10:46:14 2025
3 people
- Re: That's a "no" then? by 70s Stalwart (v2)3/4 10:19Thu Apr 3 10:19:37 2025
- Re: That's a "no" then? by MJNB3/4 10:55Thu Apr 3 10:55:51 2025
- Re: That's a "no" then? by mark-nbfc3/4 10:58Thu Apr 3 10:58:25 2025
3 people
- Re: That's a "no" then? by joetowny3/4 12:57Thu Apr 3 12:57:26 2025
1 person
- Re: That's a "no" then? by joetowny3/4 08:49Thu Apr 3 08:49:30 2025
2 people