Re: Time for plain speaking
Views: 276
I think your 'within 10-years' framework to return to the Southern League Premier Central is very realistic for the new Club.
Let me now add some Stadium logic to your thinking...
I believe that Nuneaton Town FC CIC should be considering remaining at The Oval for at least another 5 years.
I say that because that's how long (IMO) the NBBC planning process will take (at best) to find a suitable site & for the new Club to commence the build programme for a new Stadium in the town of Nuneaton.
Now, it has to be remembered that The Oval (IMO) will only be suitable for playing at Level 7/Step 3 (the SLPC).
To progress to the National League North, the Oval will need further development...back to FUTURE-PROOFING.
Now the dilemma, if the present custodians of the new Club think it is a dilemma?
If progress on the field is better than expected (& I am sure that is what the supporters would like to see?) the existing arrangement at The Oval/the new Stadium build (if possible) will need to keep pace with the on-field progress...
...the OFF-FIELD stuff needs to stay ahead of the ON-FIELD stuff JUST-IN-TIME...
Just my thoughts!
Edited by VoR at 12:05:44 on 3rd April 2025
Edited by VoR at 12:06:51 on 3rd April 2025
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Next article in this thread: That's a "no" then? by Unnamed Sauce1/4 22:07Tue Apr 1 22:07:12 2025
Time for plain speaking by Unnamed Sauce1/4 20:07Tue Apr 1 20:07:00 2025 10 peopleview thread- Re: Time for plain speaking by Armchair vulture1/4 21:12Tue Apr 1 21:12:23 2025 5 people
- Re: Time for plain speaking by MJNB2/4 16:03Wed Apr 2 16:03:53 2025 4 people
- Re: Time for plain speaking by bert's dadYesterday 10:44Yesterday at 10:44:27
- Re: Time for plain speaking by VoRYesterday 12:04Yesterday at 12:04:29 1 person
- That's a "no" then? by Unnamed Sauce1/4 22:07Tue Apr 1 22:07:12 2025 3 people
- Re: That's a "no" then? by Armchair vulture2/4 21:07Wed Apr 2 21:07:11 2025 1 person
- Re: That's a "no" then? by Lord of the Manor I'mYesterday 06:15Yesterday at 06:15:46 1 person
- Re: That's a "no" then? by almost average 2Yesterday 06:25Yesterday at 06:25:36 1 person
- Re: That's a "no" then? by MJNBYesterday 10:08Yesterday at 10:08:31
- Re: That's a "no" then? by almost average 2Yesterday 14:42Yesterday at 14:42:32
- Re: That's a "no" then? by Lord of the Manor I'mToday 03:33Today at 03:33:35
- Re: That's a "no" then? by bert's dadToday 10:11Today at 10:11:43
- Re: That's a "no" then? by VoRToday 11:06Today at 11:06:37
- Re: That's a "no" then? by Vernon2Today 11:17Today at 11:17:54
- Re: That's a "no" then? by VoRToday 11:27Today at 11:27:12
- Re: That's a "no" then? by Vernon2Today 12:11Today at 12:11:20
- Re: That's a "no" then? by Lord of the Manor I'mToday 12:29Today at 12:29:28
- Re: That's a "no" then? by Lord of the Manor I'mToday 12:29Today at 12:29:04
- Re: That's a "no" then? by VoRToday 12:22Today at 12:22:48
- Re: That's a "no" then? by GustavusYesterday 10:46Yesterday at 10:46:14 3 people
- Re: That's a "no" then? by 70s Stalwart (v2)Yesterday 10:19Yesterday at 10:19:37
- Re: That's a "no" then? by MJNBYesterday 10:55Yesterday at 10:55:51
- Re: That's a "no" then? by mark-nbfcYesterday 10:58Yesterday at 10:58:25 3 people
- Re: That's a "no" then? by joetownyYesterday 12:57Yesterday at 12:57:26 1 person
- Re: That's a "no" then? by joetownyYesterday 08:49Yesterday at 08:49:30 2 people