Return to front page

Newest article: Lovely article by Unnamed SauceToday 00:01Today at 00:01:05view thread

Oldest article: No subject by s. tone ragma710/2/2024 15:21Sat Feb 10 15:21:36 2024view thread

MenuSearch

Next thread: Trev! by Camp hill reserves Yesterday 22:52Yesterday at 22:52:06view thread

Re: That's a "no" then?

By bert's dadYesterday 20:39Yesterday at 20:39:58In response to Re: That's a "no" then?

Views: 54

Yes I know. I just think they need to be cautious in the long run. They are planning based upon 300 which is fine but once they start planning for over 400 or start increasing prices over £10 they need to be careful of falling into the old traps.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Next article in this thread: Re: That's a "no" then? by VoRYesterday 20:45Yesterday at 20:45:30

Previous thread: No subject by LHYesterday 16:58Yesterday at 16:58:36view thread