Re: Damp Squid?
Views: 198
You summed up Danico…at times unplayable, but there were far too many times when he was ineffective.
Way too inconsistent to be POS.
Edwards/Carsley have been very consistent.
Recci and Carrithers also very important players.
Spruce was superb again when he came on yesterday, and he must start the final imo.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Next article in this thread: Opinions by Unnamed SauceToday 10:58Today at 10:58:13
Boro 0 Smethwick 1 by BoropodYesterday 15:40Yesterday at 15:40:16view thread- HT Boro 0 Smethwick 2 by BoropodYesterday 15:46Yesterday at 15:46:06
- Boro 1 Smethwick 2 by BoropodYesterday 16:18Yesterday at 16:18:07
- Boro 2 Smethwick 2 by BoropodYesterday 16:27Yesterday at 16:27:52
- Boro 3 Smethwick 2 by BoropodYesterday 16:52Yesterday at 16:52:57
- FT Boro 3 Smethwick 2 by BoropodYesterday 16:55Yesterday at 16:55:05
- Re: FT Boro 3 Smethwick 2 by 70s Stalwart (v2)Yesterday 17:30Yesterday at 17:30:43
- Re: FT Boro 3 Smethwick 2 by almost average 2Yesterday 18:05Yesterday at 18:05:37
- Re: FT Boro 3 Smethwick 2 by 70s Stalwart (v2)Yesterday 18:16Yesterday at 18:16:57
- Well that was interesting! by Unnamed SauceYesterday 18:47Yesterday at 18:47:34
- Re: Well that was interesting! by Lord of the Manor I'mYesterday 20:13Yesterday at 20:13:25
1 person - Damp Squid? by Unnamed SauceYesterday 20:23Yesterday at 20:23:15
- Re: Damp Squid? by Atty BoroToday 10:21Today at 10:21:29
- Opinions by Unnamed SauceToday 10:58Today at 10:58:13 1 person
- Re: Opinions by Lord of the Manor I'mToday 12:35Today at 12:35:06
- Deservedly by Unnamed SauceToday 17:22Today at 17:22:05
- Re: Damp Squid? by mark-nbfcYesterday 21:01Yesterday at 21:01:30
- a neutral enjoyed it by Unnamed SauceYesterday 21:33Yesterday at 21:33:42