Opinions
Views: 175
It's what makes this (at times) a Forum. With interesting and divergent viewpoints. No one really distinguished themselves first half yesterday except perhaps Carsley. So it could be argued that at 0-2 down at HT they were all ineffective.
There were several contenders for MoM yesterday. Danico was (as you suggest) not among them. Carsley was immense. My only criticism is that he overhits corners occasionally.
Edwards is a bit of a legend. Going forwards there is always a frisson: a hope that something might be the end result. Boro used to have loads of players with that kind of charisma. It's nice to see it returning. Last few seasons under You Know Who there were too few heroes.
Recci's two goals especially the second which our neutral viewer (rightly) admired were turning points.
Subs yesterday were (as have often proved this season) pivotal. That's been a highlight every game for me. We have gamechangers in virtually every position and coaches who know how to use them to freshen things up.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Next article in this thread: Re: Opinions by Lord of the Manor I'mToday 12:35Today at 12:35:06
Boro 0 Smethwick 1 by BoropodYesterday 15:40Yesterday at 15:40:16view thread- HT Boro 0 Smethwick 2 by BoropodYesterday 15:46Yesterday at 15:46:06
- Boro 1 Smethwick 2 by BoropodYesterday 16:18Yesterday at 16:18:07
- Boro 2 Smethwick 2 by BoropodYesterday 16:27Yesterday at 16:27:52
- Boro 3 Smethwick 2 by BoropodYesterday 16:52Yesterday at 16:52:57
- FT Boro 3 Smethwick 2 by BoropodYesterday 16:55Yesterday at 16:55:05
- Re: FT Boro 3 Smethwick 2 by 70s Stalwart (v2)Yesterday 17:30Yesterday at 17:30:43
- Re: FT Boro 3 Smethwick 2 by almost average 2Yesterday 18:05Yesterday at 18:05:37
- Re: FT Boro 3 Smethwick 2 by 70s Stalwart (v2)Yesterday 18:16Yesterday at 18:16:57
- Well that was interesting! by Unnamed SauceYesterday 18:47Yesterday at 18:47:34
- Re: Well that was interesting! by Lord of the Manor I'mYesterday 20:13Yesterday at 20:13:25 1 person
- Damp Squid? by Unnamed SauceYesterday 20:23Yesterday at 20:23:15
- Re: Damp Squid? by Atty BoroToday 10:21Today at 10:21:29
- Opinions by Unnamed SauceToday 10:58Today at 10:58:13 1 person
- Re: Opinions by Lord of the Manor I'mToday 12:35Today at 12:35:06
- Deservedly by Unnamed SauceToday 17:22Today at 17:22:05
- Re: Damp Squid? by mark-nbfcYesterday 21:01Yesterday at 21:01:30
- a neutral enjoyed it by Unnamed SauceYesterday 21:33Yesterday at 21:33:42