Return to front page

Newest article: Re: Rugby town reprived by VoRToday 22:26Today at 22:26:47view thread

Oldest article: Impressed by Pieman17/3/2024 10:48Sun Mar 17 10:48:44 2024view thread

MenuSearch

Next thread: Fixtures by deano7031/5 21:03Sat May 31 21:03:02 2025view thread

Re: Coventry United away game

By VoR19/5 15:56Mon May 19 15:56:47 2025In response to Re: Coventry United away game

Views: 675

It is a site that IMO is sympathetic to highways & environmental requirements.

These will be major Planning issues & could cost significant sums of money to resolve, to be paid for by the Developer (NTFC CIC).

NBBC Planners will require a Transport Assessment to be submitted with the Planning Application, that will involve a Traffic Study & a good, well thought out Travel Plan

There is also the potential for the Developer to pay more significant sums of money of money by way of Section 106 contributions & Section 278 Works for highways improvements.

We are talking about serious amounts of money here Greg, which need to be mitigated.

Plus the cost of numerous environmental reports, to satisfy the Planners.

NTFC CIC need a good Planning Consultant on board now to co-ordinate all of these actions/planning requirements & represent the new Club in their negotiations with NBBC.

Without delay, to avoid going around in circles & wasting valuable funds.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Next article in this thread: Re: Coventry United away game by Greg (NBFC)19/5 18:02Mon May 19 18:02:11 2025

Previous thread: Back to nuneaton by Wolfman27/5 14:20Tue May 27 14:20:42 2025view thread