Return to front page

Newest article: Chettle by VS CityYesterday 22:20Yesterday at 22:20:44view thread

Oldest article: Working at a well run club by VS City29/3/2024 17:07Fri Mar 29 17:07:14 2024view thread

MenuSearch

Next thread: Fixtures by deano7031/5 21:03Sat May 31 21:03:02 2025view thread

Re: Coventry United away game

By VoR25/5 22:19Sun May 25 22:19:30 2025In response to Re: Coventry United away game

Views: 284

The Planning costs can quite easily escalate to prohibitive numbers.

Gaining a satisfactory Planning Permission should be looked upon as a commercial negotiation with NBBC, where they expect to receive a financial benefit, usually by way of a S106 Agreement.

WCC Highways will determine the extent of any S278 Works that are required.

Then there is the Planning Fee to consider...

From a construction point of view, the greatest risk on any site is the possibility of finding problems in the ground, which require ground remediation or ground improvement.

Lee has mentioned in his April report about looking at multiple sites (that's not what they want to do) & they are right not to be given the run around.

Any site that is offered with a previous history of being used as a tip (possibly an uncontrolled tip) should IMO have a line put through it!

Once a preferred site has been chosen, an extensive Ground Investigation should be carried out under the guidance of a Civil Engineering Consultant.

Just my thoughts!

reply to this article | return to the front page

Next article in this thread: Re: Coventry United away game by Armchair vulture25/5 22:22Sun May 25 22:22:19 2025

Previous thread: Back to nuneaton by Wolfman27/5 14:20Tue May 27 14:20:42 2025view thread