Return to front page

Newest article: Don't think so by Unnamed SauceToday 21:47Today at 21:47:15view thread

Oldest article: Yeovil 1 Boro 3 by Unnamed Sauce17/8/2025 19:41Sun Aug 17 19:41:54 2025view thread

MenuSearch

Next thread: Remarkable by Vernon Slain25/11/2025 21:43Tue Nov 25 21:43:46 2025view thread

Re: Good work but:

By Vernon Slain21/11/2025 19:01Fri Nov 21 19:01:07 2025In response to Re: Good work but:

Views: 862

I have a niggle or two Lee over the Vale View Project. If a vendor is offering a piece of land to rent or buy with the intention of building a football stadium on it,why is the impetus on the buyer or leaseholder to determine that the piece of land is suitable for this ? And secondly,if the liability is on the buyer or leaseholder,does the projected cost of £150,000 say that the Vale View site is not the one to choose ? Especially if any report is detrimental to the FC.
Genuine questions to you Lee and not any attempt to have a dig,I have and will continue my support wheresoever.

Little by little.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Next article in this thread: Re: Good work but: by LH21/11/2025 19:57Fri Nov 21 19:57:07 2025

Previous thread: Vase by Lord of the Manor I'm24/11/2025 13:23Mon Nov 24 13:23:31 2025view thread