Return to front page

Newest article: Don't think so by Unnamed SauceToday 21:47Today at 21:47:15view thread

Oldest article: Yeovil 1 Boro 3 by Unnamed Sauce17/8/2025 19:41Sun Aug 17 19:41:54 2025view thread

MenuSearch

Next thread: Remarkable by Vernon Slain25/11/2025 21:43Tue Nov 25 21:43:46 2025view thread

Re: Good work but:

By VoR21/11/2025 20:52Fri Nov 21 20:52:26 2025In response to Re: Good work but:

Views: 916

My advice Lee would be to consider the costs associated with carrying out an Enabling Works Contract.

With a site of this nature, with potential historical land use issues affecting development, it is essential to firstly carry out the survey work necessary to determine the likely problems & then to assess the costs involved with remediating the site, to bring it forward for further development.

The surveys required would comprise the following:-

Coal Mining Risk Assessment.
Extensive Ground Investigation Survey.
Topographical Site Survey.

Also, advice should be sought from NBBC's Tree Officer to establish existing trees that may be subject TPO's.

These surveys should be commissioned by a Civil & Structural Engineering Consultant (appointed by the Club) who can then make recommendations, that in turn can be costed by a Consultant Quantity Surveyor (again appointed by the Club).

Only when the likely cost of remediating the site (via an Enabling Works Contract) is known, can a decision be made as to whether the site is commercially viable or not?

All of this work will need to be paid for by NTFC.

Edited by VoR at 20:53:58 on 21st November 2025

reply to this article | return to the front page

Next article in this thread: Re: Good work but: by LH21/11/2025 21:03Fri Nov 21 21:03:27 2025

Previous thread: Vase by Lord of the Manor I'm24/11/2025 13:23Mon Nov 24 13:23:31 2025view thread