Return to front page

Newest article: Re: I was at this one, too by BoropodToday 17:56Today at 17:56:11view thread

Oldest article: Yeovil 1 Boro 3 by Unnamed Sauce17/8/2025 19:41Sun Aug 17 19:41:54 2025view thread

MenuSearch

Next thread: GAME OFF by LH20/12/2025 11:13Sat Dec 20 11:13:21 2025view thread

Different view

By VS City (VS Boro)15/12/2025 09:11Mon Dec 15 09:11:31 2025In response to Re: We mustn't gloat

Views: 1157

My slant on the ground-share is somewhat different.

The Boro were going to be made homeless and there was no other option available. Plus, add in the Stocker factor.

Boro could not afford to build a stadium AND pay the going rate for the land.
The compromise would be offer a lower payment and a favourable long term ground share agreement.
The Nuns got the money they needed with assurances of long term tenure at a low prices and Boro got somewhere to build a stadium.

I am NOT one for conspiracies, but I can't help think the way it panned out was planned from the day stocker gave his presentation which ensured Boro would never go bust.
Stocker got his money; Neale got the contract; Neale got the ground and the Nuns suffered.

>>>> Former Nuneaton Boro fan <<<<

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Next article in this thread: Yup. by joetowny15/12/2025 10:08Mon Dec 15 10:08:09 2025

Previous thread: Tomorrow's Game by Unnamed Sauce19/12/2025 11:30Fri Dec 19 11:30:55 2025view thread