Return to front page

Newest article: Re: I was at this one, too by BoropodToday 17:56Today at 17:56:11view thread

Oldest article: Yeovil 1 Boro 3 by Unnamed Sauce17/8/2025 19:41Sun Aug 17 19:41:54 2025view thread

MenuSearch

Next thread: Allocations by deano7014/5 13:46Thu May 14 13:46:26 2026view thread

Re: A classic post

By VoR11/5 09:05Mon May 11 09:05:51 2026In response to Re: A classic post

Views: 496

I assume that was temporary segregation & those measures would have been at an exceptional/additional cost to NTFC?

LH could confirm that fact/cost?

Edit:

Where the Police are concerned, they have a public duty to ensure spectator safety outside the Oval (at no extra cost) but any Police presence inside the Oval would need to be paid for by NTFC.

This is an issue at major sporting venues (eg Premier League Stadiums), that's why Clubs elect to train/employ their own security staff/stewards, to keep their Policing costs to a minimum.

Edited by VoR at 09:10:15 on 11th May 2026
Edited by VoR at 09:13:46 on 11th May 2026

reply to this article | return to the front page

Next article in this thread: Re: A classic post by Stockingford Blue11/5 11:20Mon May 11 11:20:51 2026

Previous thread: It's Gainsborough Day by Unnamed Sauce13/5 09:12Wed May 13 09:12:09 2026view thread