Return to front page

Newest article: Re: Penalty by Camp hill reserves Yesterday 21:43Yesterday at 21:43:56view thread

Oldest article: Tonight's line Up by CockandBear9/12/2025 19:29Tue Dec 9 19:29:27 2025view thread

MenuSearch

Next thread: Cup and trophy by MJNB29/6 13:09Mon Jun 29 13:09:10 2026view thread

Re: Vale view

By VoR22/6 18:47Mon Jun 22 18:47:14 2026In response to Re: Vale view

Views: 757

IMO, they are all valid reasons to object, given the scale of the proposals.

Again, IMO, WCC Highways would be a major consultee.

They key driver for me is the underlying ground conditions & where the Engineers can find original ground?

I would have serious reservations about the potential amount of abnormal ground to be encountered in the construction & the extent of the exceptional costs arising?

It would be useful to carry out a Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) Survey across the entire site. That would identify any solid obstructions up to a depth of 3 metres, including finding out if there are any mineshafts that have been capped.

GPR Surveys are also used in preliminary Archeological surveys to find any potential items of interest.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Next article in this thread: Re: Vale view by Armchair vulture22/6 20:30Mon Jun 22 20:30:58 2026

Previous thread: NBBC Playing Pitch Strategy by VoR28/6 16:07Sun Jun 28 16:07:16 2026view thread