Return to front page

Newest article: Re: Player agree’s terms by almost average 2Today 18:05Today at 18:05:13view thread

Oldest article: Finn Osborn by s. tone ragma717/1 21:06Wed Jan 17 21:06:39 2024view thread

MenuSearch

Next thread: Boro Leisure to be struck off by Boropod22/5 11:08Wed May 22 11:08:09 2024view thread

Re: Animal Farm?

By VS City (VS Boro)19/5 12:50Sun May 19 12:50:46 2024In response to Re: Animal Farm?

Views: 452

This is a NEW club. A club that has come into existence due to miss-management of a previous club many times over.

I absolutely accept it may be unfair on individuals but I would rather no one with any past (no matter how distant) connection with Nuneaton Boro.

This club should be about building and doing the right thing on many levels. If the club struggles on the field next season then so-what?

From what is being said, the club is being run in a similar way to history (but with constitution limitations and supporter-rep involved) by the same people involved in the last club. This along with "our history" which seems to forget it has probably more bad times than good.

Why is someone who apparently did not apply for the job now manager? Why was he approached? what convinced him to change his mind?

I said all this when the procedure was outlined and if anything my resolute has continued.

PS - One of the pre-requsists was "play attacking football". Has Acton showed this during his previous managements (1 game at. CUFC).

PPS - The manager at Barwell has knowledge and success at this level. Whilst I know he has a job, perhaps he could have been tempted ;)

>>>> Former Nuneaton Boro fan <<<<

Edited by VS Boro at 12:51:39 on 19th May 2024
Edited by VS Boro at 12:52:58 on 19th May 2024

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Next article in this thread: Re: Animal Farm? by s. tone ragma719/5 14:46Sun May 19 14:46:29 2024

Previous thread: Ass covering by stripes4me20/5 11:17Mon May 20 11:17:03 2024view thread