Return to front page

Newest article: Re: £6.000 needed to kick the season off by mark-nbfcYesterday 21:05Yesterday at 21:05:23view thread

Oldest article: Nuns/Arden Tigress by London Boro19/1 06:26Fri Jan 19 06:26:27 2024view thread

MenuSearch

Reply to "Re: Summary"

You must log in or register before you can post an article

return to the front page

Re: Summary

By Gustavus26/1 13:34Fri Jan 26 13:34:14 2024In response to Re: Summary

Views: 538

I think first thing would be a constitution.

To provide a framework for decisions and accountability.

Any board should ideally have specific roles for football; commercial: legal; finance; estates; supporters; administration including minutes.

There should be a couple of non exec directors purely to see things run properly.

IMO if this had been in place and genuine civic minded characters involved there would never have been separation of ground and club; a feud with neighbours; massive outspending of income; and non payment of rent. Which are what led directly to what has happened!

If the CoOp follows such rules and keeps on the straight and narrow then why shouldn’t a football club claiming to represent the town?

Edited by Gustavus at 13:44:31 on 26th January 2024