Return to front page

Newest article: Re: Another new signing by WotnostrikersYesterday 20:07Yesterday at 20:07:38view thread

Oldest article: FA Vase winners 2027-28 by Camp hill reserves 18/1 16:30Thu Jan 18 16:30:49 2024view thread

MenuSearch

Reply to "Re: Hinckley Leicester Road"

You must log in or register before you can post an article

return to the front page

Re: Hinckley Leicester Road

By VS Dysfunctional (VS Boro)17/2 14:10Sat Feb 17 14:10:48 2024In response to Re: Hinckley Leicester Road

Views: 813

My understanding is
a) the coop backed initiative will be run by sponsors and include the coop from day 1.
b) the coop constitution will be such that getting into debt (deficit) will be difficult.
c) the coop initiative will probably/possibly not be as successful on the field initially, but has far more longevity.

as things stand.
1) Neither initiative have a ground to play on anywhere.
2) One has support of previous local sponsors; the other does not.
3) One talks about national sponsors, but not substance to this claim.
4) One has dreams of the FL, the other does not.
5) One has decided on the kit; the other has not.
6) One has support and advice from expert(s) the other has support from NBFC secretary.

I see not much more from one initiative than I saw from Hawkins other than they own a business.
At least when JG came on board there was confidence he could (and did) attract sponsorship that was neglected by Thorn. How did that end?

>>>> Former Nuneaton Boro fan <<<<