Return to front page

Newest article: Re: Any game today? by Unnamed SauceYesterday 22:00Yesterday at 22:00:29view thread

Oldest article: Have we considered setting up our new club as a fr… by VoR31/1 07:52Wed Jan 31 07:52:57 2024view thread

MenuSearch

Reply to "Re: The truth the fans deserve "

You must log in or register before you can post an article

return to the front page

Re: The truth the fans deserve

By VS City (VS Boro)19/5 21:12Sun May 19 21:12:59 2024In response to Re: The truth the fans deserve

Views: 1334

The person who has been appointed did not apply for the Job OR was considered by the sub-committee.


Normal practice is if something is vetoed either the 2nd or 3rd choice is accepted OR the process starts again.

If names were spouted about before hand, thats not good (whether that spouted by the board or the sub-group). As is "We were further surprised to be informed that non-voting members of the board had also influenced the process" (but that may be nothing; but why say).

"Hello; this is our recommendation based on pre-agreed criteria".
"Don't worry about it, I had a word with my mate and he is going to be manager"

I have no idea if the recommendation was presented to the board then another was sought by the board OR the board had gone alone before process was complete.

>>>> Former Nuneaton Boro fan <<<<