Return to front page

Newest article: Lovely article by Unnamed SauceToday 00:01Today at 00:01:05view thread

Oldest article: Kane Richards by s. tone ragma79/2/2024 19:13Fri Feb 9 19:13:38 2024view thread

MenuSearch

Reply to "Re: The truth the fans deserve "

You must log in or register before you can post an article

return to the front page

Re: The truth the fans deserve

By VS City (VS Boro)19/5/2024 21:12Sun May 19 21:12:59 2024In response to Re: The truth the fans deserve

Views: 1480

The person who has been appointed did not apply for the Job OR was considered by the sub-committee.


Normal practice is if something is vetoed either the 2nd or 3rd choice is accepted OR the process starts again.

If names were spouted about before hand, thats not good (whether that spouted by the board or the sub-group). As is "We were further surprised to be informed that non-voting members of the board had also influenced the process" (but that may be nothing; but why say).

"Hello; this is our recommendation based on pre-agreed criteria".
"Don't worry about it, I had a word with my mate and he is going to be manager"

I have no idea if the recommendation was presented to the board then another was sought by the board OR the board had gone alone before process was complete.

>>>> Former Nuneaton Boro fan <<<<