Return to front page

Newest article: Re: Um.. by almost average 2Yesterday 16:41Yesterday at 16:41:26view thread

Oldest article: Fao Mark by Armchair vulture24/1 16:50Wed Jan 24 16:50:07 2024view thread

MenuSearch

Reply to "Re: Club Statement"

You must log in or register before you can post an article

return to the front page

Re: Club Statement

By The_Hullablue21/5 17:24Tue May 21 17:24:47 2024In response to Re: Club Statement

Views: 935

Derek posted on both forums about his reasons for it.

Seeing as I do not know who the others were, I cannot comment on if all of then agreed to his version.

I do know though that he has not been able to offer explanation as to what the board did that was outside the remit/agreements etc with the subcommittee.

It seems from DD's own admission, the subcommittee knew that the board was not going to just runberstamp the subcommittee's recommendation and that the board had never said that if the subcommittee recommendation was not deemed acceptable they would ask the subcommittee to go through the process again.

So, in short, despite Derek making several posts, his story is very light on details and facts, and heavy on accusations he has not been able to back up.

-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
How bright should floodlights be in the Conference?

Edited by The_Hullablue at 17:25:40 on 21st May 2024