Return to front page

Newest article: Re: And yet another one by s. tone ragma7Yesterday 18:55Yesterday at 18:55:49view thread

Oldest article: FA Vase winners 2027-28 by Camp hill reserves 18/1 16:30Thu Jan 18 16:30:49 2024view thread

MenuSearch

Reply to "Re: SHOCKED +1"

You must log in or register before you can post an article

return to the front page

Re: SHOCKED +1

By Jebbs23/5 14:21Thu May 23 14:21:14 2024In response to Re: SHOCKED +1

Views: 277

Many companies, particularly those appointing someone in high profile positions check social media as a matter of course.

They did VS.
The company appointing someone absolutely did what you said.

If anything 'good' has come from this it's the way the process worked up that that point. Everyone should feel proud.
Sub Group tasked to find preferred candidates through footballing cv etc and then passing on the info to the Club.
Club then does some scrunity (as you'd expect a company that is planning on appointing someone would) and makes a decision on whatever is or isn't found under that scrutiny.
In this case they found something that wasn't inline with the principles of the CIC so didn't appoint him.
Absolutely brilliant work from both the Sub Group and the Football Club Board in my opinion.