Return to front page

Newest article: Oh dear by Unnamed SauceToday 19:32Today at 19:32:30view thread

Oldest article: Chesterfield by bert's dad6/2/2024 08:15Tue Feb 6 08:15:05 2024view thread

MenuSearch

Reply to "Re: LW is not the only option for a return to town"

You must log in or register before you can post an article

return to the front page

Re: LW is not the only option for a return to town

By VS City (VS Boro)8/9/2024 17:54Sun Sep 8 17:54:11 2024In response to Re: LW is not the only option for a return to town

Views: 1372

I’ve always championed 3G pitches at the level boro would realistically expect themselves to play on.

I know the ground has flooded a few times; but it’s pretty rare. I have no idea what damage would be done. It may be possible to raise a meter when installing - clubs like Rushall and Tamworth both levelled the pitch and with the former at least it was certainly raised and not lowered.

With “rugby/football” club relations.
At the time of the move the football club held all the cards.
Even after the football club reformed it did as it was still the land owner.

Things are different now with both on par and needing something.
* Nuns - pitch by clubhouse.
* Boro - pitch in Nuneaton.

The ground has a pitch (work needed) two covered ends; a club house and changing rooms.. surely something can be worked out.

>>>> Former Nuneaton Boro fan <<<<