Re: Back to Nuneaton Fund
Views: 473
The money they've raised so far wont even get you a planning application. Architects fees and most importantly to start with planning agents who will charge at least 100 quid an hour.
Say they find a site:
1. The council have already said they won't help the club financially and with Boros track record why would they?
2 Limited areas of land and none within the traditional fan base area.
3. Any site will require access infrastructure costs.
4. Just because there is land and money it don't mean you'll get planning permission.
5. Any proposed new ground next to residential development will incur the wrath of local residents and their councilors will have a field day.
Remember too where Leamington have had to play for many years- basically on farm land.
Remember 20 odd years ago Boro approached the council for site recommendations.
All these sites failed and so Boro were shunted in with the Nuns on the towns eastern extremities, far away from the traditional fanbase.
At this time Boro had an asset to sell, all be it complicated with the covenant and club debt.
I reckon you're looking at 3million quid for a basic setup akin to Stratford town.
Grants can be procured but this will only take you so far.
And a big mistake would be to create any new ground far away from the fanbase; Liberty way drove many traditional Manor Park supporters away and the club needs as many fans as it can get.
Looking at the local plan I see no sites suitable in the Stockingford/Camp Hill area or anything near the location of Manor Park.
Me? Id be a cheeky sod and get together with the council and Beduth- sell the oval for much needed housing.
Use this money along with grants to construct a new ground shared by both clubs including leisure facilities, a corporate area to make money and 4G pitches which could bring in money.
The location? Land between the two towns in the vicinity of Bermuda park - green belt but get justification for the development using the NPPF. And remember the new Labour government are pushing the need for new housing so everyone's a winner.
Pie in the sky perhaps but no harm in asking.
The hard part in all this is trying to persuade the LA when you consider the football clubs financial reputation over the last 50 years.
Liberty way? waste of time but may be the only option if Town could somehow get back.
Whatever happens it will be a long long road back sadly and the reality of the damage done the last few years will soon become far more apparent.
Although no longer a supporter myself I wish all you town fans the best of luck for getting the club back into Nuneaton but it aint gonna be easy without a big money investor.
- Back to Nuneaton Fund by ntfcadam7/1 13:51Tue Jan 7 13:51:29 2025 1 personview thread
- Re: Back to Nuneaton Fund by Armchair vulture7/1 22:39Tue Jan 7 22:39:47 2025
- Re: Back to Nuneaton Fund by s. tone ragma7Yesterday 08:49Yesterday at 08:49:59
- Re: Back to Nuneaton Fund by Armchair vultureYesterday 09:51Yesterday at 09:51:39
- Re: Back to Nuneaton Fund by Unnamed SauceYesterday 09:59Yesterday at 09:59:08
- Re: Back to Nuneaton Fund by Armchair vultureYesterday 10:11Yesterday at 10:11:02
- Re: Back to Nuneaton Fund by MJNBYesterday 11:05Yesterday at 11:05:02
- Re: Back to Nuneaton Fund by Unnamed SauceYesterday 14:44Yesterday at 14:44:30 1 person
- Re: Back to Nuneaton Fund by bert's dadYesterday 21:37Yesterday at 21:37:45 2 people
- Re: Back to Nuneaton Fund by Unnamed SauceToday 09:06Today at 09:06:46
- Re: Back to Nuneaton Fund by MJNBYesterday 19:27Yesterday at 19:27:06 3 people
- Re: Back to Nuneaton Fund by Unnamed SauceYesterday 20:48Yesterday at 20:48:47
- Well said n/t by GustavusYesterday 19:59Yesterday at 19:59:42
- Re: Back to Nuneaton Fund by Camp hill reserves Yesterday 15:00Yesterday at 15:00:40 1 person
- Re: Back to Nuneaton Fund by Lord of the Manor I'mYesterday 14:00Yesterday at 14:00:47 1 person
- Re: Back to Nuneaton Fund by Lord of the Manor I'mYesterday 10:12Yesterday at 10:12:48
- Re: Back to Nuneaton Fund by Armchair vultureYesterday 10:21Yesterday at 10:21:20
- Re: Back to Nuneaton Fund by joetownyYesterday 10:48Yesterday at 10:48:57 2 people
- The latest debacle? by Unnamed SauceYesterday 18:56Yesterday at 18:56:26
- Re: The latest debacle? by joetownyYesterday 22:13Yesterday at 22:13:12
- Re: The latest debacle? by MJNBYesterday 19:30Yesterday at 19:30:54 1 person
- Re: Back to Nuneaton Fund by Boropod7/1 15:13Tue Jan 7 15:13:51 2025
- Re: Back to Nuneaton Fund by almost average 27/1 17:27Tue Jan 7 17:27:01 2025 2 people
- Re: Back to Nuneaton Fund by Lord of the Manor I'm7/1 19:06Tue Jan 7 19:06:56 2025
- Re: Back to Nuneaton Fund by almost average 27/1 19:14Tue Jan 7 19:14:59 2025 1 person
- Re: Back to Nuneaton Fund by almost average 27/1 19:28Tue Jan 7 19:28:10 2025
- If only,, by Unnamed Sauce7/1 19:57Tue Jan 7 19:57:27 2025 3 people
- Re: If only,, by MJNBYesterday 11:07Yesterday at 11:07:37
- open invitation by Camp hill reserves 7/1 20:13Tue Jan 7 20:13:17 2025
- Re: open invitation by almost average 2Yesterday 13:05Yesterday at 13:05:00 1 person
- Re: open invitation by bert's dadToday 08:47Today at 08:47:33 1 person
- Re: open invitation by boro44Yesterday 23:54Yesterday at 23:54:04 1 person
- Re: open invitation by Vernon2Today 08:55Today at 08:55:21
- Re: open invitation by s. tone ragma7Yesterday 15:46Yesterday at 15:46:23 3 people
- Re: open invitation by MJNBYesterday 19:33Yesterday at 19:33:48
- Re: open invitation by s. tone ragma7Yesterday 19:36Yesterday at 19:36:50
- Re: open invitation by MJNBYesterday 19:38Yesterday at 19:38:14
- Re: open invitation by Armchair vultureYesterday 20:00Yesterday at 20:00:35
- Re: open invitation by Lord of the Manor I'mYesterday 14:06Yesterday at 14:06:20
- Re: open invitation by Armchair vultureYesterday 20:45Yesterday at 20:45:05
- Enjoyment by Unnamed SauceYesterday 14:49Yesterday at 14:49:56 1 person
- Re: Enjoyment by VS CityYesterday 16:02Yesterday at 16:02:25 1 person
- Re: Enjoyment by Snappycroc UTTYesterday 19:22Yesterday at 19:22:24
- Re: Enjoyment by Snappycroc UTTYesterday 19:22Yesterday at 19:22:38
- Re: Enjoyment by s. tone ragma7Yesterday 16:05Yesterday at 16:05:59