Re: Back to Nuneaton Fund
Views: 449
Really?Manor park had a legal covenant. The NPPF states that any development in designated green space/ green be!t has to be justified and that any playing field has to be replaced if lost and that would occur if a new facility was built. The miners welfare park may be a registered park or garden so it would be a hurdle but Labour are pushing to changes to the planning system to push residential development.
I'm telling you now there is no land in Nuneaton that wouldn't incur large development costs and town will never have the money to build anything without significant financial help. The council wont hand over cash for Town to build a new ground themselves.
Boro couldn't even afford to fix the driveway properly at Liberty way.
There are fewer sites in Nuneaton now,20 odd years after the council recommended the previous failed sites and looking at the local plan most land has already been earmarked for residential and other development.
I reckon Town will be at Beduth for years.
A sad state of affairs but the damage done the last few years is immense. Going bust is one thing but losing your home ground is quite another and the road back home will be very difficult sadly unless of course some big money person turns up and takes a.punt.
Edit: The miners welfare park is not a registered park and garden and if it was there is no consent system relating to such assets.
Edited by Armchair vulture at 10:34:37 on 8th January 2025
Edited by Armchair vulture at 10:35:42 on 8th January 2025
- Back to Nuneaton Fund by ntfcadam7/1 13:51Tue Jan 7 13:51:29 2025 1 personview thread
- Re: Back to Nuneaton Fund by Armchair vulture7/1 22:39Tue Jan 7 22:39:47 2025
- Re: Back to Nuneaton Fund by s. tone ragma7Yesterday 08:49Yesterday at 08:49:59
- Re: Back to Nuneaton Fund by Armchair vultureYesterday 09:51Yesterday at 09:51:39
- Re: Back to Nuneaton Fund by Unnamed SauceYesterday 09:59Yesterday at 09:59:08
- Re: Back to Nuneaton Fund by Armchair vultureYesterday 10:11Yesterday at 10:11:02
- Re: Back to Nuneaton Fund by MJNBYesterday 11:05Yesterday at 11:05:02
- Re: Back to Nuneaton Fund by Unnamed SauceYesterday 14:44Yesterday at 14:44:30 1 person
- Re: Back to Nuneaton Fund by bert's dadYesterday 21:37Yesterday at 21:37:45 2 people
- Re: Back to Nuneaton Fund by s. tone ragma7Today 12:15Today at 12:15:59
- Re: Back to Nuneaton Fund by Unnamed SauceToday 09:06Today at 09:06:46
- Re: Back to Nuneaton Fund by MJNBYesterday 19:27Yesterday at 19:27:06 3 people
- Re: Back to Nuneaton Fund by Unnamed SauceYesterday 20:48Yesterday at 20:48:47 1 person
- Well said n/t by GustavusYesterday 19:59Yesterday at 19:59:42
- Re: Back to Nuneaton Fund by Camp hill reserves Yesterday 15:00Yesterday at 15:00:40 1 person
- Re: Back to Nuneaton Fund by Lord of the Manor I'mYesterday 14:00Yesterday at 14:00:47 1 person
- Re: Back to Nuneaton Fund by Lord of the Manor I'mYesterday 10:12Yesterday at 10:12:48
- Re: Back to Nuneaton Fund by Armchair vultureYesterday 10:21Yesterday at 10:21:20
- Re: Back to Nuneaton Fund by joetownyYesterday 10:48Yesterday at 10:48:57 2 people
- The latest debacle? by Unnamed SauceYesterday 18:56Yesterday at 18:56:26
- Re: The latest debacle? by joetownyYesterday 22:13Yesterday at 22:13:12
- Re: The latest debacle? by MJNBYesterday 19:30Yesterday at 19:30:54 2 people
- Re: Back to Nuneaton Fund by Boropod7/1 15:13Tue Jan 7 15:13:51 2025
- Re: Back to Nuneaton Fund by almost average 27/1 17:27Tue Jan 7 17:27:01 2025 2 people
- Re: Back to Nuneaton Fund by Lord of the Manor I'm7/1 19:06Tue Jan 7 19:06:56 2025
- Re: Back to Nuneaton Fund by almost average 27/1 19:14Tue Jan 7 19:14:59 2025 1 person
- Re: Back to Nuneaton Fund by almost average 27/1 19:28Tue Jan 7 19:28:10 2025
- If only,, by Unnamed Sauce7/1 19:57Tue Jan 7 19:57:27 2025 3 people
- Re: If only,, by MJNBYesterday 11:07Yesterday at 11:07:37
- open invitation by Camp hill reserves 7/1 20:13Tue Jan 7 20:13:17 2025
- Re: open invitation by almost average 2Yesterday 13:05Yesterday at 13:05:00 2 people
- Re: open invitation by bert's dadToday 08:47Today at 08:47:33 2 people
- Re: open invitation by MJNBToday 10:58Today at 10:58:22 1 person
- Re: open invitation by joetownyToday 10:30Today at 10:30:54 1 person
- Re: open invitation by boro44Yesterday 23:54Yesterday at 23:54:04 2 people
- Re: open invitation by MJNBToday 10:59Today at 10:59:26
- Re: open invitation by Armchair vultureToday 10:19Today at 10:19:05 1 person
- Re: open invitation by VoRToday 13:06Today at 13:06:21
- Re: open invitation by Armchair vultureToday 13:43Today at 13:43:11
- Re: open invitation by VoRToday 14:02Today at 14:02:55
- Re: open invitation by Vernon2Today 08:55Today at 08:55:21 2 people
- Re: open invitation by MJNBToday 11:04Today at 11:04:50 2 people
- Re: open invitation by s. tone ragma7Yesterday 15:46Yesterday at 15:46:23 6 people
- Re: open invitation by MJNBYesterday 19:33Yesterday at 19:33:48
- Re: open invitation by s. tone ragma7Yesterday 19:36Yesterday at 19:36:50
- Re: open invitation by MJNBYesterday 19:38Yesterday at 19:38:14
- Re: open invitation by Armchair vultureYesterday 20:00Yesterday at 20:00:35 1 person
- Re: open invitation by Lord of the Manor I'mYesterday 14:06Yesterday at 14:06:20 1 person
- Re: open invitation by Armchair vultureYesterday 20:45Yesterday at 20:45:05
- Enjoyment by Unnamed SauceYesterday 14:49Yesterday at 14:49:56 2 people
- Re: Enjoyment by VS CityYesterday 16:02Yesterday at 16:02:25 1 person
- Re: Enjoyment by Snappycroc UTTYesterday 19:22Yesterday at 19:22:24
- Re: Enjoyment by Snappycroc UTTYesterday 19:22Yesterday at 19:22:38
- Re: Enjoyment by s. tone ragma7Yesterday 16:05Yesterday at 16:05:59