Return to front page

Newest article: Re: Worked hard for that by BoropodToday 17:44Today at 17:44:02view thread

Oldest article: Chesterfield by bert's dad6/2/2024 08:15Tue Feb 6 08:15:05 2024view thread

MenuSearch

Reply to "Re: Back to Nuneaton Fund"

You must log in or register before you can post an article

return to the front page

Re: Back to Nuneaton Fund

By Armchair vulture8/1 09:51Wed Jan 8 09:51:39 2025In response to Re: Back to Nuneaton Fund

Views: 1038

Really?Manor park had a legal covenant. The NPPF states that any development in designated green space/ green be!t has to be justified and that any playing field has to be replaced if lost and that would occur if a new facility was built. The miners welfare park may be a registered park or garden so it would be a hurdle but Labour are pushing to changes to the planning system to push residential development.
I'm telling you now there is no land in Nuneaton that wouldn't incur large development costs and town will never have the money to build anything without significant financial help. The council wont hand over cash for Town to build a new ground themselves.
Boro couldn't even afford to fix the driveway properly at Liberty way.
There are fewer sites in Nuneaton now,20 odd years after the council recommended the previous failed sites and looking at the local plan most land has already been earmarked for residential and other development.
I reckon Town will be at Beduth for years.
A sad state of affairs but the damage done the last few years is immense. Going bust is one thing but losing your home ground is quite another and the road back home will be very difficult sadly unless of course some big money person turns up and takes a.punt.

Edit: The miners welfare park is not a registered park and garden and if it was there is no consent system relating to such assets.

Edited by Armchair vulture at 10:34:37 on 8th January 2025
Edited by Armchair vulture at 10:35:42 on 8th January 2025