Return to front page

Newest article: Re: That's a "no" then? by Lord of the Manor I'mToday 03:33Today at 03:33:35view thread

Oldest article: Kane Richards by s. tone ragma79/2/2024 19:13Fri Feb 9 19:13:38 2024view thread

MenuSearch

Reply to "Re: FT Coton 0 v Boro 2"

You must log in or register before you can post an article

return to the front page

Re: FT Coton 0 v Boro 2

By VS City (VS Boro)13/2 20:38Thu Feb 13 20:38:43 2025In response to Re: FT Coton 0 v Boro 2

Views: 338

No one who paid their money at the turnstiles had any real influence to "fight for the club".

The changes Neale/Brown, Thorn, Smurfwaite, Hawkins & Ginelley appeared to be the only option at the time.

What disappointed me was how many just lapped up what they said (add DA Capital** and H&H to that list).*
Most if all wanted the team to be successful (and get the plaudits) without much consideration to THE CLUB. With the last 2 of the list I don't think their ownership made 1 jot of difference to THE CLUB, other than delay the inevitable. THE CLUB was a status symbol/pay thing to them.

What we have now is actual transparency where THE CLUB is the important thing whilst very important, success on the field is secondary. I suspect the majority (it will never be 100%) will accept mediocracy on the field as they know THE CLUB is being run for the future and not the now.


* It wasn't if the clues were not there to be seen.

** Now known as AP Technologies Group PLC.

>>>> Former Nuneaton Boro fan <<<<