Return to front page

Newest article: Re: Back to nuneaton by Lord of the Manor I'mToday 18:56Today at 18:56:37view thread

Oldest article: Tammy promotion by Lord of the Manor7/3/2024 16:17Thu Mar 7 16:17:59 2024view thread

MenuSearch

Reply to "Re: Coventry United away game"

You must log in or register before you can post an article

return to the front page

Re: Coventry United away game

By VoR25/5 22:19Sun May 25 22:19:30 2025In response to Re: Coventry United away game

Views: 97

The Planning costs can quite easily escalate to prohibitive numbers.

Gaining a satisfactory Planning Permission should be looked upon as a commercial negotiation with NBBC, where they expect to receive a financial benefit, usually by way of a S106 Agreement.

WCC Highways will determine the extent of any S278 Works that are required.

Then there is the Planning Fee to consider...

From a construction point of view, the greatest risk on any site is the possibility of finding problems in the ground, which require ground remediation or ground improvement.

Lee has mentioned in his April report about looking at multiple sites (that's not what they want to do) & they are right not to be given the run around.

Any site that is offered with a previous history of being used as a tip (possibly an uncontrolled tip) should IMO have a line put through it!

Once a preferred site has been chosen, an extensive Ground Investigation should be carried out under the guidance of a Civil Engineering Consultant.

Just my thoughts!