Return to front page

Newest article: Re: I was at this one, too by BoropodToday 17:56Today at 17:56:11view thread

Oldest article: Yeovil 1 Boro 3 by Unnamed Sauce17/8/2025 19:41Sun Aug 17 19:41:54 2025view thread

MenuSearch

Reply to "Re: Not going back to nuneaton "

You must log in or register before you can post an article

return to the front page

Re: Not going back to nuneaton

By VoR26/8/2025 12:58Tue Aug 26 12:58:37 2025In response to Not going back to nuneaton

Views: 2877

I think if everyone settles down to the idea that the Town will be playing at the Oval for at least 5 years, it will be helpful.

To qualify for Football Foundation grants, both Clubs will need to provide evidence to the FA that they have a minimum 10-year lease in place, at the levels they are currently playing at, so a wider discussion on the Town's future playing arrangements/agreement would prove very useful.

It should also be recognised that obtaining a satisfactory Planning Permission to return to Nuneaton could reasonably/realistically take up to 10 years to achieve...there are many hurdles to overcome & significant amounts of cash needed to successfully fulfill that goal.

Edit:

Up to Level 7/Step 3 a 10-year unexpired (rolling) lease is required by the Football Foundation (Premier League Stadium Fund).

Edited by VoR at 13:00:35 on 26th August 2025
Edited by VoR at 13:11:55 on 26th August 2025