Return to front page

Newest article: Re: I was at this one, too by BoropodToday 17:56Today at 17:56:11view thread

Oldest article: Yeovil 1 Boro 3 by Unnamed Sauce17/8/2025 19:41Sun Aug 17 19:41:54 2025view thread

MenuSearch

Reply to "Re: Not going back to nuneaton "

You must log in or register before you can post an article

return to the front page

Re: Not going back to nuneaton

By Armchair vulture (Armchair Observer)26/8/2025 18:30Tue Aug 26 18:30:20 2025In response to Re: Not going back to nuneaton

Views: 2850

It’s not the problem of use it’s the problem of the number of users and the impact on local residents and whether they will accept the noise, match day disturbance and other issues.
No good applying for a 400 capacity ground. If the club grows the ground will need to grow.
This is what the site looked like in 1913 before landfill.
As VOR says any build will need to address the site and what’s under there.
HW no1 works second clay hole looking towards the railway from the local of the modern Cherry tree

https://bgs.assetbank.app/assetbank-bgs/action/viewAsset?id=16094&index=0&total=5&view=viewSearchItem