Return to front page

Newest article: Don't think so by Unnamed SauceToday 21:47Today at 21:47:15view thread

Oldest article: Yeovil 1 Boro 3 by Unnamed Sauce17/8/2025 19:41Sun Aug 17 19:41:54 2025view thread

MenuSearch

Reply to "Re: Not going back to nuneaton "

You must log in or register before you can post an article

return to the front page

Re: Not going back to nuneaton

By VoR26/8/2025 20:23Tue Aug 26 20:23:13 2025In response to Re: Not going back to nuneaton

Views: 2721

That's a good summary AV.

The new Club need to be aware that even if WCC Highways approve the site, it is likely that highways improvements will be needed under a Section 278 Highways Works Agreement.

That could be anything!

The Town would have to pay for those works, because they are the Developer.

Looking at the depth of excavation in the clay pit & the subsequent depth of landfill & the nature of the fill operation (was it controlled or uncontrolled) I have serious doubts whether this site is suitable to build a new Stadium, without incurring significant additional exceptional costs in dealing with potential problems in the made ground.

An extensive Ground Investigation would be needed...costing at least £25,000