Return to front page

Newest article: Re: Never look at gift horse in the mouth by Stockingford BlueYesterday 13:39Yesterday at 13:39:29view thread

Oldest article: League leaders are "at home" tonight by Unnamed Sauce9/9/2025 09:44Tue Sep 9 09:44:53 2025view thread

MenuSearch

Reply to "Different view"

You must log in or register before you can post an article

return to the front page

Different view

By VS City (VS Boro)15/12/2025 09:11Mon Dec 15 09:11:31 2025In response to Re: We mustn't gloat

Views: 1173

My slant on the ground-share is somewhat different.

The Boro were going to be made homeless and there was no other option available. Plus, add in the Stocker factor.

Boro could not afford to build a stadium AND pay the going rate for the land.
The compromise would be offer a lower payment and a favourable long term ground share agreement.
The Nuns got the money they needed with assurances of long term tenure at a low prices and Boro got somewhere to build a stadium.

I am NOT one for conspiracies, but I can't help think the way it panned out was planned from the day stocker gave his presentation which ensured Boro would never go bust.
Stocker got his money; Neale got the contract; Neale got the ground and the Nuns suffered.

>>>> Former Nuneaton Boro fan <<<<