Return to front page

Newest article: Don't think so by Unnamed SauceToday 21:47Today at 21:47:15view thread

Oldest article: Yeovil 1 Boro 3 by Unnamed Sauce17/8/2025 19:41Sun Aug 17 19:41:54 2025view thread

MenuSearch

Reply to "Re: And and"

You must log in or register before you can post an article

return to the front page

Re: And and

By VS City (VS Boro)15/12/2025 13:20Mon Dec 15 13:20:31 2025In response to And

Views: 1182

Imagine the outrage if the club had announced three years ago it was leaving LW to ground share at Bedworth.

To me, not serious considering a return to LW would be foolish

* it’s in Nuneaton
* there is a pitch in place
* amenities are adequate for immediate requirements.
* expansion possible (ready for FL πŸ˜€πŸ˜€πŸ˜€πŸ˜‡πŸ˜‡πŸ˜‡)
* no resident objections.
* not suitable for domestic housing.
* opportunity to negotiate a proper long term agreement that will satisfy the owners, nuns and boro.
* I can’t see it being used for commercial proposes - is there not some sort of protection on the land - not that that counts for much.
* the nuns have other land they could use if commercial pressure/opportunity comes calling.

>>>> Former Nuneaton Boro fan <<<<

Edited by VS Boro at 13:21:29 on 15th December 2025