Return to front page

Newest article: Re: Penalty by Camp hill reserves Yesterday 21:43Yesterday at 21:43:56view thread

Oldest article: Tonight's line Up by CockandBear9/12/2025 19:29Tue Dec 9 19:29:27 2025view thread

MenuSearch

Reply to "Re: No subject"

You must log in or register before you can post an article

return to the front page

Re: No subject

By Gustavus3/7 11:39Fri Jul 3 11:39:22 2026In response to Re: No subject

Views: 618

Kerry was long gone by then

And the Directors didn’t get their money back. Pailton engineering lost a fortune. A cynic might say this was why the liquidation was undertaken.

There was also a strange situation where Neale became a Director on getting the shares then realised a Director couldn’t benefit from the assets of a liquidation so resigned as a Director. So technically it was Stanford and co who took the Club into liquidation then said they didn’t want to.

I think Neale was the only creditor who got paid up for his work.

And of course then got the ground for nothing for his company.

Then thought he’d be clever and shaft the Nuns!